Author:
Partecke Lars Ivo,Goerdt Anna-Maria,Langner Inga,Jaeger Bernd,Assadian Ojan,Heidecke Claus-Dieter,Kramer Axel,Huebner Nils-Olaf
Abstract
Background.The use of sterile gloves is part of general aseptic procedure, which aims to prevent surgical team members from transmitting infectious agents to patients during procedures performed in an operating room. In addition, surgical gloves also protect team members against patient-transmitted infectious agents. Adequate protection, however, requires that the glove material remain intact. The risk of perforations in surgical gloves is thought to correlate with the duration of wear, yet very few prospective studies have addressed this issue.Methods.We prospectively collected 898 consecutive pairs of used surgical gloves over a 9-month period in a single institution. After surgical team members wore the gloves during surgical procedures, the gloves were examined for microperforations using the watertight test described in European Norm 455, part 1. The gloves were analyzed as a pair; if 1 glove had a perforation, the pair was considered to be perforated. In addition, we evaluated the use of a hand cream that contained a suspension of cornstarch and ethanol to determine its potential influence on the rate of microperforation.Results.Wearing gloves for 90 minutes or less resulted in microperforations in 46 (15.4%) of 299 pairs of gloves, whereas wearing gloves for 91-150 minutes resulted in perforation of 54 (18.1%) of 299 pairs, and 71 of (23.7%) of 300 pairs were perforated when the duration of wear was longer than 150 minutes (P = .05). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant difference in the rates of microperforation for surgeons (56 [23.0%] of 244 pairs of gloves perforated), first assistants (43 [19.0%] of 226 pairs perforated), and surgical nurses (53 [20.5%] of 259 pairs perforated). Of 171 microperforations, 114 (66.7%) were found on the left hand glove (ie, the glove on subjects' nondominant hand), predominantly on the left index finger (55 [32.3%]). The use of the hand cream had no influence on the rate of microperforation.Conclusion.Because of the increase in the rate of microperforation over time, it is recommended that surgeons, first assistants, and surgical nurses directly assisting in the operating field change gloves after 90 minutes of surgery.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Infectious Diseases,Microbiology (medical),Epidemiology
Reference20 articles.
1. European Committee for Standardization. EN 455. Medical gloves for single use. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization; 2000.
2. The German-Speaking Working Group for Hospital Hygiene (AWMF). Hand disinfection and hand hygiene. Hyg Med 2008;33:300-313. Available at: http://www.uni-duesseldorf.de/WWW/AWMF/. Accessed March 27, 2009.
3. Glove Perforation in Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery
4. Assessment of the risk of glove puncture during oral surgery procedures
5. Glove perforation and contamination in primary total hip arthroplasty
Cited by
92 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Implementing Good Practice in Aseptic Technique for Surgery in Laboratory Animals: Recommendations by the European Academy of Laboratory Animal Surgery (EALAS);Veterinary Medicine and Science;2024-08-23
2. Antimicrobial approach of abdominal post-surgical infections;World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery;2023-12-27
3. Glove Rupture Detection System using skin impedance.;2023 International Conference on the Confluence of Advancements in Robotics, Vision and Interdisciplinary Technology Management (IC-RVITM);2023-11-28
4. Antiseptic measures in breast implant surgery: A survey among Dutch plastic surgeons;Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery;2023-08
5. Surgical Hand Preparation;Infection Control in Small Animal Clinical Practice;2023-05-02