Abstract
There is danger in stressing commonalities among methods because the differences matter in fixing the meaning of our claims. Different methods can, and often do, test the same claim. But it takes a strong network of theory and empirical results to ensure that. Failing that, we are likely to fall into inference by pun. We use one set of methods to establish a claim and then draw inferences licensed by a similar-sounding claim that calls for different methods of testing. Our inferences fail, and bridges we build (or policies we set) depending on them fall down.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Reference15 articles.
1. Hunting Causes and Using Them
2. Re-Engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings
3. Statistics and Causal Inference;Holland;Journal of the American Statistical Association,1986
4. Efstathiou, Sophia . 2009. “The Use of ‘Race’ as a Variable in Biomedical Research.” PhD diss., University of California, San Diego.
5. Evidence-Based Policy
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Liste des ouvrages cités;Comprendre et communiquer la science;2020-12-16
2. The significance of levels of organization for scientific research: A heuristic approach 1;Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences;2018-04