Abstract
Many philosophers argue that the emphasis on commercializing scientific research—and particularly on patenting the results of research—is both epistemically and socially detrimental, in part because it inhibits the flow of information. One of the most important of these criticisms is the “tragedy of the anticommons” thesis. Some have attempted to test this thesis empirically, and many have argued that these empirical tests effectively falsify the thesis. I argue that they neither falsify nor disconfirm the thesis because they do not actually test it. Additionally, I argue that there is other evidence that actually supports the thesis.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Reference18 articles.
1. A Note on Science and Technology in a Democratic Order;Merton;Journal of Legal and Political Sociology,1942
2. Lessons from the Vioxx Debacle: What the Privatization of Science Can Teach Us About Social Epistemology
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Doing Violence to the Production of Scientific Knowledge;Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics;2024
2. Jeopardizing Discoverability;Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning;2022
3. Eco-Cognitive Openness and Eco-Cognitive Closure;Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning;2022
4. Human Creative Abduction Assaulted;Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics;2017
5. Free Flow of Scientific Information Versus Intellectual Property Rights;Scientific Scholarly Communication;2017