Abstract
The disappearance of small languages occurs through an obligatory phase of collective natural bilingualism (i.e., bilingualism resulting from language contacts) and ends with the transition of the language community to a more widespread and promising language. The disappearance of languages is the most large-scale manifestation and realization of the desire of the language system for monolingualism; with individual natural bilingualism, this desire manifests itself as linguistic attrition. Mathematical modeling of the phenomenon confirmed the hypothesis about the instability of natural bilingualism: both the individual one, and the collective natural bilingualism providing «double» communication, are at the same time a phase of transition to monolingualism. Language keepers are monolinguals, therefore the main condition for the preservation of an ethnic language is the existence of a monolingual repository (e.g., a country where the majority of the population has one mother tongue). At the same time, monolinguals can have as many foreign languages mastered in a logical way. Optimal for the preservation of any ethnic language (not just a small one) is the monolingualism of preschoolers (indigenous language) and the introduction of the second, third, etc. languages at the school age in a logical way. Keywords: disappearance of languages, collective natural bilingualism, artificial bilingualism, language attritions, non-linear dynamics, mathematical modeling, unstable state, monolingual repository.
Publisher
Peoples' Friendship University of Russia
Subject
Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering,Materials Science (miscellaneous),Business and International Management
Reference41 articles.
1. Krauss, M. 1992. The world’s languages in crisis. Language 68 (1): 4–10. Print.
2. Simons, G.F., and M.P. Lewis. 2013. The world’s languages in crisis: A 20-year update. In Responses to language endangerment. In honor of Mickey Noonan. Studies in Language Companion Series 142. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Pp. 3–19. Print.
3. Harmon, D., and J. Loh. 2010. The Index of Linguistic Diversity: A new quantitative measure of trends in the status of the world’s languages. Language Documentation and Conservation 4: 97–151. Print.
4. Arefiev, A.L. 2014. Languages of the indigenous peoples of the North and the Far East in the education system: history and modernity. Moscow: Center for Social Forecasting and Marketing publ. Print. (In Russ.)
5. Alpatov, V.M. 2014. Language policy in Russia and the world. In Language policy and language conflicts in the modern world: International conference (Moscow, September 16–19, 2014): Reports and messages of the Institute of Foreign Languages of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Research Center for National-Language Relations. Russian Federation, Moscow, IL RAS. Moscow: THESAURUS publ. Print. (In Russ.)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献