Mesh-less laparoscopic treatment of apical prolapse-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Mesh-less laparoscopic treatment of apical prolapse

Published:2021-06-30 Issue:2 Volume:13 Page:179-181
ISSN:2684-4230
Container-title:Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn
language:en
Short-container-title:Facts Views Vis ObGyn

Author:

Aleksandrov A.¹,Smith A.V.²,Rabischong B.³,Botchorishvili R.³

Affiliation:

1. Department of Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Estaing, Clermont- Ferrand, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Specialised Hospital for Obstetrics and Gynecology SBAGAL Pr. Dimitar Stamatov Varna, Medical University Varna, Bulgaria

2. Department of Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Estaing, Clermont- Ferrand, France; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Higueras Hospital, Conception, Chile

3. Department of Gynecological Surgery, University Hospital Estaing, Clermont- Ferrand, France

Abstract

The pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common gynaecological problem, affecting nearly 50% of women over 40. The sacrocolpopexy using a synthetic mesh is now considered the “gold standard” for management of women with apical prolapse. In April 2019 the FDA placed a ban on the production of transvaginal meshes for prolapse due to late complications. The meshes for abdominal repair of POP are still used, but in future they may also be prohibited. The goal of the following video is to present a mesh-less modification of two techniques used for apical organ prolapse, the sacrocolpopexy and the pectopexy.

Publisher

Universa BV

Reference13 articles.

1. Abhyankar P, Uny I, Semple K et al. Women’s experiences of receiving care for pelvic organ prolapse: a qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2019;19.

2. Acsinte O, Rabischong B, Bourdel N et al. Laparoscopic Promontofixation in 10 Steps. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018;25:767.

3. Banerjee C, Noé K. Laparoscopic pectopexy: a new technique of prolapse surgery for obese patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;284:631-5.

4. Barber M, Maher C. Epidemiology and outcome assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1783-90.

5. Bergman I, Söderberg M, Kjaeldgaard A et al. Does the choice of suture material matter in anterior and posterior colporrhaphy? Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27:1357-65.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Chronic pelvic pain syndrome in women of reproductive age: An observational cohort clinical ultrasound study;Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin;2024-08-24

2. Literature review, surgical decision making algorithm, and AGREE II‐S comparison of national and international recommendations and guidelines in pelvic organ prolapse surgery;International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics;2024-05-17

3. A Randomised Trial on the Effects of the Addition of Uterosacral Ligament Plication to Pectopexy Operation on Anatomical Restoration and Female Sexual Functions;International Urogynecology Journal;2024-04-29

4. Ultrasound Morphometry of the Pelvic Floor Muscles in Women of Reproductive Age;Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology;2024-04-07

5. Modern methods of surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse;Astrakhan medical journal;2023-10-23