Author:
Pedone Anchora L,Bizzarri N,Gallotta V,Chiantera V,Fanfani F,Fogotti A,Cosentino F,Vizzielli G,Carbone V,Ferrandina G,Scambia G
Abstract
Background: Recently, it has been sustained that only surgeons skilled in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (MI-RH) could provide valuable oncological outcomes in early-stage cervical cancer. Still, literature lacks data correlating surgeon experience with patient survival rate. We aimed to investigate the impact of surgeon training on this rate.
Methods: This is a retrospective study of 243 early-stage cervical cancer treated with MI-RH. Multiple regression analyses were undertaken to investigate the impact of the surgeons learning curve, according to the number of MI-RH, on patients prognosis.
Results: A steady trend of reduction in disease recurrence risk is associated with increased surgeon experience. The peak of the learning curve was shown at the 19th MI-RH (hazard ratio of disease-free survival: 0.321; 95%CI: 0.140-0.737; p= 0.007). The 3 years disease-free survival that a surgeon could provide to patients is significantly lower at the beginning of his/her learning path comparing to what he/she could guarantee once adequate experience had been achieved (75.4% and 91.6% respectively, p=0.005). Surgeon experience appears to be an independent prognostic factor.
Conclusion: The experience that a surgeon can achieve practicing in MI-RH significantly influences oncological outcomes of early-stage cervical cancer patients. Future studies comparing minimally invasive and open surgery should take this into account. It would be advisable that the scientific community precisely establishes the minimum training required in the field of MI-RH for early-stage cervical cancer.
Reference46 articles.
1. Bansal N, Herzog TJ, Shaw RE et al. Primary therapy for earlystage cervical cancer: radical hysterectomy vs radiation. Am J Obs Gynecol. 2009;201:485.e1–9.
2. Barletta F, Corrado G, Vizza E. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with the use of SNAIL Tenaculum™. A simplified uterine manipulator for the management of early cervical cancer. It J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015;27:N.1.
3. Boussios S, Seraj E, Zarkavelis G et al. Management of patients with recurrent/advanced cervical cancer beyond first line platinum regimens: Where do we stand? A literature review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;108:164-74.
4. Brandt B, Sioulas V, Basaran D et al. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes. Gynecol Oncol. 2020;156:591-597.
5. Cao T, Feng Y, Huang Q et al. Prognostic and safety roles in laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: A meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015;25:990-8.
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献