Abstract
A comparison and analysis of temperament peculiarities and character features, self-regulation, cognitive and activity style, communicative, perceptive and іnteractive competence, emotional intelligence and barriers in communication, emotional states and direction, life values, coping strategies for persons with different level of inclination to avoidance in complex life situations are made. Interconnections between inclination to avoidance and rigidity, reactivity, assertiveness, social contacting in complex life situations, asocial inclination, moral normativity, activity modeling and evaluation, chaotic and controlled cognitive and activity style, self-regulation, communicative competence, social intuition, conflict behavior, stress-resilience, aggressiveness, sadness, gnostic and gloristic emotional direction are analyzed and interpreted.
Reference19 articles.
1. Berg C.A., Meegan S.P., Deviney P.P. A social-contextual model of coping with everyday problems across the lifespan. International Journal of Behavioral Development,1998, № 22(2): 231-237.
2. Koplik E.K. et al. The Relationship of Mother-Child Coping Styles and Mother’s Presence of Children’s Response to Dental Stress. The Journal of Psychology, 1992, № 126(1): 79-92.
3. Vitaliano P.P. et al. Coping Profiles Associated with Psychiatric, Physical Health, Work and Family Problems. Health Psychology, 1990, № 9(3): 348-376.
4. Быкова Д.В. Прокрастинация как проявление эмоционально-ориентированного и ориентированного на избегание копинга. Психология стресса и совладающего поведения. Материалы ІІ Международной научно-практической конференции, Кострома, 2010, Т.2: 194 - 196.
5. Frydenberg E., Lewis R. Teaching Coping to adolescents: when and to whom? American Educational Research Journal, Fall 2000, Т.37, № 3: 727-745.