Author:
Hashim Sattar,Ahmed Ahmed,Jomaa Nayef
Abstract
In academic writing, the stance and engagement features establish an important area because they help writers convey their impressions, messages, and attitudes towards their readers. In spite of the increasing studies tackling this issue, limited studies have focused on EFL Libyan students. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the stance and engagement markers in the conclusion sections of ten Ph.D. theses of Libyan postgraduates; five of them are from the soft domain specifically business administration field (B), and the other five are from the hard domain specifically the electrical-electronics engineering (EE). The current study used Hyland’s (2005) model to explore stance and engagement markers used in the conclusion sections. The findings show that the total number of the stance in the soft domain conclusions is (117), and the total number of the engagement markers is (35), whereas in the hard domain, (27) were for the stance and (13) were for the engagement. Such findings could be employed academically to enhance EFL Libyan students’ performance in academic writing.
Reference44 articles.
1. Atkinson, D. (2001). Reflections and refractions on the JSLW special issue on voice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 107-124.
2. Connor, U. (2002). New directions in contrastive rhetoric. TESOL Quarterly 36 (4), 493- 510.
3. Crismore, A. and Farnsworth, R. (1990) 'Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse'. In W. Nash (ed.). The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 118-36.
4. Dahl, T. (2004). Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline? Journal of Pragmatics, 36, 1807– 1825.
5. Dunleavy, P. (2003). Authoring a PhD: how to plan, draft, write and finish a doctoral thesis or dissertation. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.