Lots of movement, little progress: a review of reptile home range literature

Author:

Crane Matthew1,Silva Inês23,Marshall Benjamin M.4,Strine Colin T.4

Affiliation:

1. Conservation Ecology Program, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, Bangkhuntien / Bangkok, Thailand

2. (CASUS), Center for Advanced Systems Understanding, Görlitz, Germany

3. (HZDR), Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany

4. School of Biology, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand

Abstract

Reptiles are the most species-rich terrestrial vertebrate group with a broad diversity of life history traits. Biotelemetry is an essential methodology for studying reptiles as it compensates for several limitations when studying their natural history. We evaluated trends in terrestrial reptile spatial ecology studies focusing upon quantifying home ranges for the past twenty years. We assessed 290 English-language reptile home range studies published from 2000–2019 via a structured literature review investigating publications’ study location, taxonomic group, methodology, reporting, and analytical techniques. Substantial biases remain in both location and taxonomic groups in the literature, with nearly half of all studies (45%) originating from the USA. Snakes were most often studied, and crocodiles were least often studied, while testudines tended to have the greatest within study sample sizes. More than half of all studies lacked critical methodological details, limiting the number of studies for inclusion in future meta-analyses (55% of studies lacked information on individual tracking durations, and 51% lacked sufficient information on the number of times researchers recorded positions). Studies continue to rely on outdated methods to quantify space-use (including Minimum Convex Polygons and Kernel Density Estimators), often failing to report subtleties regarding decisions that have substantial impact on home range area estimates. Moving forward researchers can select a suite of appropriate analytical techniques tailored to their research question (dynamic Brownian Bridge Movement Models for within sample interpolation, and autocorrelated Kernel Density Estimators for beyond sample extrapolation). Only 1.4% of all evaluated studies linked to available and usable telemetry data, further hindering scientific consensus. We ultimately implore herpetologists to adopt transparent reporting practices and make liberal use of open data platforms to maximize progress in the field of reptile spatial ecology.

Funder

The Institute of Science and Institute of Research and Development for Logistic Support at Suranaree University of Technology

King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference102 articles.

1. Making science transparent by default: introducing the TOP statement;Aalbersberg;OSF Preprints,2018

2. Sampling interval affects the estimation of movement parameters in four species of African snakes: sampling interval affects estimation of movement;Alexander;Journal of Zoology,2015

3. Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond;Allen;PLOS Biology,2019

4. Computational Reproducibility in the wildlife society’s flagship journals;Archmiller;The Journal of Wildlife Management,2020

5. Reptile home ranges revisited: a case study of space use of Sonoran Desert tortoises (Gopherus morafkai);Averill-Murray;Herpetological Conservation and Biology,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3