Transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances the specificity of multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: a critical narrative review

Author:

Snow Nicholas J.1ORCID,Murphy Hannah M.1,Chaves Arthur R.234ORCID,Moore Craig S.1,Ploughman Michelle1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada

2. Faculty of Health Sciences, Interdisciplinary School of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada

3. Neuromodulation Research Clinic, The Royal’s Institute of Mental Health Research, Ottawa, ON, Canada

4. Département de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, QC, Canada

Abstract

Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an immune-mediated neurodegenerative disease that involves attacks of inflammatory demyelination and axonal damage, with variable but continuous disability accumulation. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive method to characterize conduction loss and axonal damage in the corticospinal tract. TMS as a technique provides indices of corticospinal tract function that may serve as putative MS biomarkers. To date, no reviews have directly addressed the diagnostic performance of TMS in MS. The authors aimed to conduct a critical narrative review on the diagnostic performance of TMS in MS. Methods The authors searched the Embase, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for studies that reported the sensitivity and/or specificity of any reported TMS technique compared to established clinical MS diagnostic criteria. Studies were summarized and critically appraised for their quality and validity. Results Seventeen of 1,073 records were included for data extraction and critical appraisal. Markers of demyelination and axonal damage—most notably, central motor conduction time (CMCT)—were specific, but not sensitive, for MS. Thirteen (76%), two (12%), and two (12%) studies exhibited high, unclear, and low risk of bias, respectively. No study demonstrated validity for TMS techniques as diagnostic biomarkers in MS. Conclusions CMCT has the potential to: (1) enhance the specificity of clinical MS diagnostic criteria by “ruling in” true-positives, or (2) revise a diagnosis from relapsing to progressive forms of MS. However, there is presently insufficient high-quality evidence to recommend any TMS technique in the diagnostic algorithm for MS.

Publisher

PeerJ

Reference90 articles.

1. FDA-NIH biomarker working group;Adeniyi,2016

2. The role of transcranial magnetic stimulation as a surrogate marker of disease activity in patients with multiple sclerosis: a literature review;Alsharidah;Innovations in Clinical Neuroscience,2022

3. Diagnostic biomarkers in Alzheimer’s disease;Andersen;Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry,2021

4. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework;Atkinson;Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics,2001

5. SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles;Baethge;Research Integrity and Peer Review,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3