The influence of a manipulation of threat on experimentally-induced secondary hyperalgesia

Author:

Bedwell Gillian J.12,Louw Caron2,Parker Romy2ORCID,van den Broeke Emanuel3,Vlaeyen Johan W.45ORCID,Moseley G. Lorimer6ORCID,Madden Victoria J.2467ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

2. Pain Unit, Department of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

3. Institute of Neuroscience, Division Cognitive and Systems, UC Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

4. Research Group Health Psychology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

5. Experimental Health Psychology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, Netherlands

6. IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia

7. Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa

Abstract

Pain is thought to be influenced by the threat value of the particular context in which it occurs. However, the mechanisms by which a threat achieves this influence on pain are unclear. Here, we explore how threat influences experimentally-induced secondary hyperalgesia, which is thought to be a manifestation of central sensitization. We developed an experimental study to investigate the effect of a manipulation of threat on experimentally-induced secondary hyperalgesia in 26 healthy human adults (16 identifying as female; 10 as male). We induced secondary hyperalgesia at both forearms using high-frequency electrical stimulation. Prior to the induction, we used a previously successful method to manipulate threat of tissue damage at one forearm (threat site). The effect of the threat manipulation was determined by comparing participant-rated anxiety, perceived threat, and pain during the experimental induction of secondary hyperalgesia, between the threat and control sites. We hypothesized that the threat site would show greater secondary hyperalgesia (primary outcome) and greater surface area (secondary outcome) of induced secondary hyperalgesia than the control site. Despite a thorough piloting procedure to test the threat manipulation, our data showed no main effect of site on pain, anxiety, or threat ratings during high-frequency electrical stimulation. In the light of no difference in threat between sites, the primary and secondary hypotheses cannot be tested. We discuss reasons why we were unable to replicate the efficacy of this established threat manipulation in our sample, including: (1) competition between threats, (2) generalization of learned threat value, (3) safety cues, (4) trust, and requirements for participant safety, (5) sampling bias, (6) sample-specific habituation to threat, and (7) implausibility of (sham) skin examination and report. Better strategies to manipulate threat are required for further research on the mechanisms by which threat influences pain.

Funder

University of Cape Town

PainSA

South African Society of Physiotherapy

Pfizer

National Research Fund

Oppenheimer Memorial Trust

Fonds de Recherche Clinique (FRC) of UCLouvain

Methusalem Funding

National Health & Medical Research Council of Australia

South African National Research Foundation

Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health

IASP Developing Countries Collaborative Research Grant

Publisher

PeerJ

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,General Medicine,General Neuroscience

Reference90 articles.

1. The meaning of pain influences its experienced intensity;Arntz;Pain,2004

2. gridExtra: miscellaneous functions for graphics. R package version 2.3;Auguie,2017

3. Effect of sympathetic activity on capsaicin-evoked pain, hyperalgesia, and vasodilatation;Baron;Neurology,1999

4. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-7;Bates,2015

5. Pain in men wounded in battle;Beecher;Annals of Surgery,1946

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3