Establishing alternative grain networks: A comparison of case experiences in South Tyrol, Italy, and Colorado, United States

Author:

Meyer NannaORCID,Sacchi GiovannaORCID,Sartori Camilla,Fischer Christian

Abstract

Alternative grain networks (AGNs) are micro-systems that supplement conventional food pro­duction and distribution systems, emphasizing high quality food and leveraging regional, socio-cultural, and socio-economic values. In this multiple case study analysis we compare two AGNs, Regiokorn in South Tyrol, Italy, and the Colorado Grain Chain (CGC) in the U.S., using qualitative and comparative analysis to explore the indicators of geographical proximity, cultural homogeneity, commercial viability, and community involvement. Regiokorn and the CGC differ in various ways in these operational dimensions as well as in their organizational setups, the former as a pure business network and the latter including consumer mem­bers. Our findings highlight how these two differ­ent organizational structures can be leveraged to achieve similar outcomes, and provide valuable insights for other AGNs in finding their own paths.

Publisher

Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems

Reference52 articles.

1. Altieri, M. (2009). Agroecology, small farms, and food sovereignty. Monthly Review, 61(3). https://monthlyreview.org/2009/07/01/agroecology-small-farms-and-food-sovereignty/

2. ASTAT. (2019). Redditi e condizioni di vita delle famiglie 2018-2019 e stima 2020 [Income and living conditions of families 2018-2019 and estimated 2020]. Istituto provinciale di statistica-Provincia autonoma di Bolzano, Alto Adige. https://statistics-astat.provincia.bz.it/EK/index_i.html

3. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). Sage.

4. Bilek, C. (2019, January 17). Being a Colorado native is a big deal. So how many are there, actually? CPR News. https://www.cpr.org/2019/01/17/being-a-colorado-native-is-a-big-deal-so-how-many-are-there-actually/

5. Brunori, G., Galli, F., Barjolle, D., van Broekhuizen, R., Colombo, L., Giampietro, M., Kirwan, J.,Lang, T., Mathijs, E., Maye, D., De Roest, K., Rougoor, C., Schwarz, J., Schmitt, E., Smith, J., Stojanovic, Z., Tisenkopfs, T., & Touzard, J. M. (2016). Are local food chains more sustainable than global food chains? Considerations for assessment. Sustainability, 8(5), Article 449. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU8050449

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3