Making and measuring change in the food system: The perspectives of funders

Author:

Shostak SaraORCID

Abstract

Given the centrality of philanthropic funding to the work of nonprofit food access and food justice organizations, it is surprising how little we know about how foundations conceptualize and assess their grant-making across the food system. Based on an analysis of interviews with program officers at foundations that support food system interven­tions in New England, this paper describes founda­tions’ initial (and evolving) motivations for grant-making, the outcomes that they expect from investments, and the kinds of information that they see as convincing evidence for such outcomes. At the same time, it explores how program officers’ experiences of responding to the COVID-19 pan­demic and to contemporaneous calls to redress systemic racism have shaped their practices. This paper points to opportunities for new relationships between community-based organizations and foundations, especially as program officers ex­periment with practices of trust-based philan­thropy. It also highlights, however, the challenges posed by philanthropic board members’ assump­tions about quantifiable program outcomes and concerns about supporting overtly “political” work.

Publisher

Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems

Reference28 articles.

1. Barman, E. (2016). Caring capitalism: The meaning and measure of social value. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316104590

2. Cairns, K. (2018). Beyond magic carrots: Garden pedagogies and the rhetoric of effects. Harvard Educational Review, 88(4), 516-537. https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-88.4.516

3. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.

4. Dorsey, C., Bradach, J., & Kim, P. (2021). Racial equity and philanthropy: Disparities in funding for leaders of color leave impact on the table. Echoing Green and The Bridgespan Group. https://www.bridgespan.org/insights/disparities-nonprofit-funding-for-leaders-of-color

5. Ebrahim, A. (2005). Accountability myopia: Losing sight of organizational learning. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34(1), 56-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764004269430

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3