"Attending to History" in Major System Change in Healthcare in England: Specialist Cancer Surgery Service Reconfiguration

Author:

Perry Catherine12ORCID,Boaden Ruth J.3ORCID,Black Georgia B.4ORCID,Clarke Caroline S.5ORCID,Darley Sarah6ORCID,Ramsay Angus I.G.4ORCID,Shackley David C.78ORCID,Vindrola-Padros Cecilia9ORCID,Fulop Naomi J.4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Applied Research Collaboration Greater Manchester, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

2. Division of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine & Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

3. Alliance Manchester Business School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

4. Department of Applied Health Research, University College London (UCL), London, UK.

5. UCL Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK.

6. Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

7. Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.

8. Institute of Cancer Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Manchester, UK.

9. Department of Targeted Intervention, University College London (UCL), London, UK.

Abstract

Background: The reconfiguration of specialist hospital services, with service provision concentrated in a reduced number of sites, is one example of major system change (MSC) for which there is evidence of improved patient outcomes. This paper explores the reconfiguration of specialist oesophago-gastric (OG) cancer surgery services in a large urban area of England (Greater Manchester, GM), with a focus on the role of history in this change process and how reconfiguration was achieved after previous failed attempts. Methods: This study draws on qualitative research from a mixed-methods evaluation of the reconfiguration of specialist cancer surgery services in GM. Forty-six interviews with relevant stakeholders were carried out, along with ~160 hours of observations at meetings and the acquisition of ~300 pertinent documents. Thematic analysis using deductive and inductive approaches was undertaken, guided by a framework of ‘simple rules’ for MSC. Results: Through an awareness of, and attention to, history, leaders developed a change process which took into account previous unsuccessful reconfiguration attempts, enabling them to reduce the impact of potentially challenging issues. Interviewees described attending to issues involving competition between provider sites, change leadership, engagement with stakeholders, and the need for a process of change resilient to challenge. Conclusion: Recognition of, and response to, history, using a range of perspectives, enabled this reconfiguration. Particularly important was the way in which history influenced and informed other aspects of the change process and the influence of stakeholder power. This study provides further learning about MSC and the need for a range of perspectives to enable understanding. It shows how learning from history can be used to enable successful change.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

Health Policy,Health Information Management,Leadership and Management,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health (social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3