Out-of-Pocket Expenditures for Delivery for Maternity Waiting Home Users and Non-users in Rural Zambia

Author:

Fontanet Constance P.1ORCID,Kaiser Jeanette L.1ORCID,Fong Rachel M.1ORCID,Ngoma Thandiwe2ORCID,Lori Jody R.3ORCID,Biemba Godfrey4ORCID,Munro-Kramer Michelle3,Sakala Isaac5,McGlasson Kathleen Lucile6ORCID,Vian Taryn7ORCID,Hamer Davidson H.18ORCID,Rockers Peter C.1ORCID,Scott Nancy A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

2. Department of Research, Right to Care Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

3. Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

4. National Health Research Authority, Pediatric Centre of Excellence, Lusaka, Zambia.

5. Africare Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.

6. Biostatistics and Epidemiology Data Analytics Center, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

7. Department of Global Health, School of Nursing and Health Professions, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

8. Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

Background: Utilizing maternity waiting homes (MWHs) is a strategy to improve access to skilled obstetric care in rural Zambia. However, out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses remain a barrier for many women. We assessed delivery-related expenditure for women who used MWHs and those who did not who delivered at a rural health facility. Methods: During the endline of an impact evaluation for an MWH intervention, household surveys (n = 826) were conducted with women who delivered a baby in the previous 13 months at a rural health facility and lived >10 km from a health facility in seven districts of rural Zambia. We captured the amount women reported spending on delivery. We compared OOP spending between women who used MWHs and those who did not. Amounts were converted from Zambian kwacha (ZMW) to US dollar (USD). Results: After controlling for confounders, there was no significant difference in delivery-related expenditure between women who used MWHs (US$40.01) and those who did not (US$36.66) (P=.06). Both groups reported baby clothes as the largest expenditure. MWH users reported spending slightly more on accommodation compared to those did not use MWHs, but this difference represents only a fraction of total costs associated with delivery. Conclusion: Findings suggest that for women coming from far away, utilizing MWHs while awaiting delivery is not costlier overall than for women who deliver at a health facility but do not utilize a MWH.

Publisher

Maad Rayan Publishing Company

Subject

Health Policy,Health Information Management,Leadership and Management,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Health(social science)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3