Current Capacities of Forensic Psychological and Comprehensive Analysis When Examining Footage of Procedural and Non-Procedural Actions

Author:

Sekerazh T. N.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation

Abstract

The article addresses some typical situations arising in the course of a forensic psychological examination of footage when it is necessary to establish the following factual data: signs of the credibility of the information reported, spontaneity and preparedness of an interrogated person’s speech, external influence on the given testimony, the emotional state of the interrogated person and his/her psychological characteristics. The author analyses the situations that arise when examining the footage showing informal communication. The article also determines the range of tasks to solve which, the expert needs various specialized knowledge, primarily in the fields of forensic psychology and linguistics. Expert tasks occurring in forensic analysis of the footage of procedural and non-procedural actions depend on the case’s category, significance and procedural status of the footage in the evidentiary framework on the case, and some other factors. The author pays particular attention to the scope of expert competence for different specialties, including on the issues that cannot be solved by expert means at the current stage of scientific development.

Publisher

Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice (RFCFS)

Reference42 articles.

1. Sekerazh T.N., Kuznetsov V.O. Integrated Forensic Psycholinguistic Analysis: Forms, Types, Prospects of Development. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2016. No. 4 (44). P. 98–107. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2016-4-98-107

2. Sekerazh Т.N. Psychological Analysis of Informational Materials: Establishing a New Type of Forensic Psychological Evaluation and a New Forensic Science Specialty. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 35–43. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-35-43

3. Sekerazh T.N. Expert Mistakes in Conduct of Forensic Psychological Expertise. In: Rossinskaya E.R. (ed). Forensic Expertise: Typical Mistakes. Moscow: Prospekt, 2012. P. 183–225. (In Russ.)

4. Volokhova L.A., Sekerazh T.N. Conducting Forensic Psychological Assessments Using Video Recordings of Search Operations and Investigative Actions (Overview of Forensic Practice). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2015. No. 4 (40). P. 88–97. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/64/1819-2785-2015-4-88-97

5. Gagina O.V., Kuznetsov V.O. Forensic Analysis of the Content of Audio and Video Recordings Obtained During Investigation: Review of Current State and Future Prospects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2014. No. 1 (33). P. 45–48. (In Russ.)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3