INVESTIGATION OF RP-3 SPRAY CHARACTERISTICS BASED ON SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND ACTIVE SUBSPACE CONSTRUCTION
-
Published:2024
Issue:6
Volume:34
Page:35-53
-
ISSN:1044-5110
-
Container-title:Atomization and Sprays
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Atomiz Spr
Author:
Jiang Junxin,Gao Shenyong,Chen Houchang,Hou Jianjun,Yu Wenbin,Li Wei,Zhao Feiyang
Abstract
To explore the in-cylinder fuel injection and the subsequent spray dynamics of aviation fuel RP-3, the RP-3 spray macroscopic characteristics of single-hole injectors with different nozzle diameter under varied ambient pressures and injection pressures are investigated via diffuser back-illumination imaging (DBI) experimental method. The critical factors of the variability in spray characteristics response are pointed out by setting up a one-dimensional active subspace in this study, to perform synergistic effects via multivariable sensitivity analysis. It is revealed that compared with diesel, RP-3 spray edge shows more vortex structures, which is more susceptible to gas entrainment, especially for injector with larger nozzle diameter. Increasing injection pressure and ambient pressure will lead reduced vortex structures instead. Moreover, on the whole, RP-3 produces shorter spray penetration distances, larger spray cone angle, lower spray irregularity, and smaller spray areas than diesel under same conditions. Based on multivariable sensitivity analysis, it is indicated that accordant with diesel fuel, injection pressure (P<sub>in</sub>) and ambient pressure (P<sub>b</sub>) are the controlling parameters for RP-3 spray penetration distance, and P<sub>b</sub> is dominant on RP-3 spray cone angle. However, caused by cavitation intensity, RP-3 spray cone angle is more sensitive to nozzle diameter (φ) and cavitation number (Ca). Moreover, P<sub>b</sub> dominates over the sensitivity of spray irregularity and spray area is mainly controlled by P<sub>in</sub> .
Reference32 articles.
1. Chen, L.F., Liang, Z.R., Liu, H.Y., Ding, S.R. and Li, Y.F., Sensitivity Analysis of Fuel Types and Operational Parameters on the Particulate Matter Emissions from an Aviation Piston Engine Burning Heavy Fuels, Fuel, vol. 202, pp. 520-528, 2017. 2. Constantine, P.G., Active Subspaces-Emerging Ideas for Dimension Reduction in Parameter Studies, Philadelphia, PA: SIAM, 2015a. 3. Constantine, P.G., Emory, M., Larsson, J., and Iaccarino, G., Exploiting Active Subspaces to Quantify Uncertainty in the Numerical Simulation of the HyShot II Scramjet, J. Comput. Phys., vol. 302, pp. 1-20, 2015b. 4. Constantine, P.G., Dow, E., and Wang, Q., Active Subspace Methods in Theory and Practice: Applications to Kriging Surfaces, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., vol. 36, no. 4, pp. A1500-A1524, 2014. 5. Cyril, C., Morgan, R., and Martin, R., Microscopic Imaging of the Initial Stage of Diesel Spray Formation, Fuel, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 140-150, 2015.
|
|