Ambiguity Affirmed: Commentary on the Judgement of the European Court of Human Rights in the Case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland of 18 May 2021

Author:

Kowalski MichałORCID,Masłowiec MariaORCID

Abstract

The text comments on the European Court of Human Rights judgement of 18 May 2021 in the case of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and others v. Iceland. The case is another judgement of the ECtHR dealing with the phenomenon of surrogate motherhood. Indeed, the legal consequences of surrogate motherhood vary and result in challenges both in national and international legal contexts. The judgement commented on is of high importance as it dealt with links between surrogate motherhood and adoption, as well as illustrated modern challenges for civil status registration. The text provides for an in-depth analysis of the judgement concerned and identifies some ambiguity and lack of consistence in the Court’s approach to surrogate motherhood. In the course of its analysis the Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and others case is assessed as a lost chance in this respect.

Publisher

Central European Academic Publishing

Reference11 articles.

1. Bracken, L. (2021) ‘The ECtHR’s first advisory opinion: Implications for cross-border surrogacy involving male intended parents’, Medical Law International, 21(1), pp. 3–18; https://doi.org/10.1177/09685332211002592.

2. Bracken, L. (2017) ‘Assessing the best interests of the child in cases of cross-border surrogacy: inconsistency in the Strasbourg approach?’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 39(3), pp. 368–379; https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2017.1344393.

3. Bracken, L. (2022) ‘Cross-Border Surrogacy before the European Court of Human Rights: Analysis of Valdís Fjölnisdóttir and Others v. Iceland’, European Journal of Health Law, 29(2), pp. 194–216; https://doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10059.

4. Gajda, J., Łukasiewicz, R. (2019) ‘Principles of adoption system versus surrogate motherhood’ in Mostowik, P. (ed.) Fundamental legal problems of surrogate motherhood. Global perspective. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Instytutu Wymiaru Sprawiedliwosci, pp. 709–753.

5. De Groot, D., (2021) ‘EU law and the mutual recognition of parenthood between Member States: the case of V.M.A. v Stolichna Obshtina’, [Global Governance Programme], GLOBALCIT, Special Report, 2021/01, [Global Citizenship], European University Institute, pp. 4–24.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3