Performance Assessment of Treponemal and Nontreponemal Tests for the Diagnosis of Acquired Syphilis
Author:
Silva Ângelo Antônio Oliveira12, Lima Ayla Araújo1, Vasconcelos Larissa de Carvalho Medrado1, de Almeida Rosângela Andrade1, de Freitas Natália Erdens Maron1, Habib Fernanda Lopes1, Oliva Talita Andrade3, da Silva Miralba Freire de Carvalho Ribeiro3, de Siqueira Isadora Cristina4, Santos Fred Luciano Neves15
Affiliation:
1. Advanced Public Health Laboratory, Institute Gonçalo Moniz, Foundation Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Brazil; 2. Salvador University (UNIFACS), Salvador, Brazil; 3. State Center Specializing in Diagnosis, Assistance, and Research (CEDAP), Salvador, Brazil; 4. Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, Institute Gonçalo Moniz, Foundation Oswaldo Cruz (FIOCRUZ-BA), Salvador, Brazil; 5. Integrated Translational Program in Chagas Disease from Fiocruz (Fio-Chagas), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Abstract
ABSTRACT.
There are a variety of nontreponemal test (NTT) and treponemal test (TT) kits for the serologic diagnosis of syphilis. Because of the complexity of the infection (multiple clinical stages) and the different antigens used in these kits, a systematic evaluation of the accuracy of the currently available commercial tests is warranted. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of commercially available tests for the diagnosis of syphilis infection. In this study, we analyzed one NTT (Venereal Disease Research Laboratory [VDRL] test, Wiener Laboratories, Rosario, Argentina) and two TTs (fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption [FTA-ABS] test, Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany, and syphilis recombinant ELISA v. 4.0 test [ELISA], Wiener Laboratories, Rosario, Argentina) using a panel of 187 samples, including serum samples from 31 individuals with primary syphilis, 77 with secondary syphilis, and 79 with latent syphilis. An additional 192 samples from uninfected individuals and 323 serum samples from individuals with other diseases were included. The sensitivities of the VDRL, ELISA, and FTA-ABS tests were 97.9%, 100%, and 96.3%, respectively. The VDRL and ELISA tests showed a specificity of 100%, and the FTA-ABS test showed a specificity of 99.5%. Accuracy was 98.9% for the VDRL test, 100% for the ELISA, and 97.9% for the FTA-ABS test. For primary, secondary, and latent syphilis, the ELISA achieved a diagnostic performance of 100%, whereas the sensitivity for the VDRL and FTA-ABS tests ranged from 96.8% to 98.7% and 93.7% to 98.7%, respectively. No difference was observed when the tests were used as traditional or reverse algorithms. In general, all three tests are able to discriminate positive and negative samples for syphilis, regardless of the diagnostic algorithm.
Publisher
American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Reference44 articles.
1. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016;Rowley,2019 2. Untreated maternal syphilis and adverse outcomes of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Gomez,2013 3. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030;Lawn,2016 4. Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes – estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012;Korenromp,2019 5. The endemic treponematoses;Giacani,2014
|
|