Types of Pre-Trial Form of Criminal Procedure Appeal

Author:

Rudakova Svetlana Viktorovna

Abstract

Criminal procedural appeal is one of the main ways of exercising the rights of all participants in criminal proceedings. This right is included in the procedural status of almost every participant and can be exercised exclusively within the framework of legal relations. The relevance of the research topic is emphasized by the fact that the content of the criminal procedure law allows us to assert that the entire scope of appeal is heterogeneous in its characteristics, which leads to different approaches in determining the forms of appeal. The purpose of this work is to designate and put forward for a wide scientific discussion the problem related to the definition of the system and certain types of appeal in pre-trial criminal proceedings and to propose author's approaches to its solution. On the basis of traditional methods of scientific research, methods of obtaining, studying and evaluating information of a theoretical, legislative and practical nature: dialectics, analysis (functional, systemic, logical), synthesis, generalization, modeling, comparative legal, a scientifically based idea of the types of pre-trial criminal procedural appeal, differing in essential characteristics. According to the results of the study, it was found that in the pre-trial form of appeal, which is applied independently, it is distinguished by its self-sufficiency, independence, isolation and specificity of means: several types are distinguished: universal; internal; limited; secondary; subsequent. The author believes that these types as a whole form a system of pre-trial form of criminal procedure appeal.

Publisher

Aurora Group, s.r.o

Subject

General Medicine

Reference10 articles.

1. Beketov A.O. Rukovoditel' sledstvennogo organa – sub''ekt obzhalovaniya sudebnogo resheniya v dosudebnom proizvodstve // Aktual'nye problemy rossiiskogo prava. 2016. № 11 (72). S. 152–162.

2. Burynin S.S. Konkurentsiya protsessual'nogo kontrolya i prokurorskogo nadzora za deyatel'nost'yu sledstvennykh organov // Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2020. № 4. S. 28

3. Garmyshev Ya.V. O nekotorykh problemakh obzhalovaniya opredelenii suda // Sibirskii yuridicheskii vestnik. 2012. № 2 (57). S. 129–133.

4. Grinyuk E.N. Funktsional'naya napravlennost' deyatel'nosti prokurora na stadii predvaritel'nogo rassledovaniya: voprosy teorii i normativnogo regulirovaniya // Vestnik Volgogradskoi akademii MVD Rossii. 2016. № 1 (36). S. 84–89.

5. Dobrovlyanina O.V. Pravovoe regulirovanie kassatsionnogo obzhalovaniya sudebnykh reshenii, prinyatykh v dosudebnom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve // Proverka zakonnosti i obosnovannosti sudebnykh reshenii v ugolovnom protsesse: sb. materialov Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. / pod red. K.B. Kalinovskogo. SPb.: Tsentr nauchno-informatsionnykh tekhnologii «Asterion», 2021. S. 208–213.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3