A Comparative Study of 25 mcg vs 50 mcg of Vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Author:

Bharathi Anjanappa,Kumar K Ashok,Ganga A Pavana

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objectives To compare the efficacy and safety of 25 mcg intravaginal misoprostol vs 50 mcg misoprostol for induction of labor. Material and methods This study group consisted of 100 cases of low-risk singleton pregnancies attending the antenatal clinic of SAH and RC, or admitted to the antenatal ward. Study group included singleton pregnancy, Over 37 weeks of gestation with Vertex presentation, with unfavorable cervix (bishop score <4) and patients not in labor with reactive fetal heart rate pattern with intact membranes. Women were randomized to either 25 mcg (n = 50) or 50 mcg (n = 50) of intravaginal misoprostol. The dose was repeated every 4 hours (maximum number of doses limited to 3 doses). The main outcome was induction vaginal delivery interval. Results Induction delivery interval was significantly less with 50 mcg misoprostol —9.45 hours in comparison to 25 mcg 14.2 hours (p-value <0.001), most cases delivered vaginally with 25 mcg misoprostol p value < 0.013, cesarean section rates were high in 50 mcg misoprostol group p-value <0.007, the proportion of women delivering vaginally with single dose of vaginal misoprostol was high in 50 mcg group, i.e. 64%, incidence of maternal complications like tachysystole and hyperstimulation was more with 50 mcg group. Conclusion In the present study, it is concluded that 25 mcg of misoprostol is safe and effective for labor induction. How to cite this article Bharathi A, Kumar KA, Ganga AP. A Comparative Study of 25 mcg vs 50 mcg of vaginal Misoprostol for Induction of Labor. J South Asian Feder Obst Gynae 2013;5(3):111-115.

Publisher

Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Reference30 articles.

1. Ratnam SS, Rao KB, Arulkumaran S. Chapter 15 in Obstetrics and Gynecology for PG. 2nd ed. 2003;2:155-165.

2. Desai P, Malhotra N, Shah D. Chapter 31 in Principles and Practice of Obst and Gynecology for PG. 3rd ed. 2008;1: 295-298.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3