“Me and Socrates, we are tight friends”: Co-constructing a polis of teachers and philosophers of education.

Author:

Furman Cara1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University of Maine at Farmington, ME, USA

Abstract

It is an educational truism that reflection helps teachers to be more effective and ethical. Building on John Dewey’s assertion that we learn by doing and reflecting, and Hannah Arendt’s that reflection is strengthened through discourse among peers, I argue that a valuable role for teacher educators is to be interlocutors with whom teachers can reflect. Adding to previous scholarship that positions philosophers of education as ideal interlocutors, I focus on the nature of the relationship between teachers and philosophers of education. Mirroring the format of the Socratic dialogues, I include three dialogues to explore how teachers and philosophers of education might reflect together. The first dialogue is the transcription of an interview about reflection and teaching between a former elementary school teacher colleague and me (then a doctoral student in philosophy of education). The second is a written dialogue that brings the interview into communication with Plato and Arendt to further elucidate what it means to reflect as a teacher and with teachers. The third dialogue occurred many years later as a group of philosophers of education reflected upon dialogues 1 and 2 to consider how they might better engage with teachers.

Publisher

Philosophy of Education Society of Australasia

Reference31 articles.

1. Abowitz, K. K. (2012). Responsibility, not relevance. Philosophical Studies in Education, 43, 20–24.

2. Arcilla, R. V. (2002). Why Aren’t Philosophers and Educators Speaking to Each Other? Educational Theory, 52(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00001.x

3. Arendt, H. (1971). The life of the mind (One-volume ed, Vol. 1). Harcourt, Inc.

4. Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2nd ed). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001

5. Arendt, H. (2006). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Penguin Books.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3