Affiliation:
1. Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia
2. Garut University, Indonesia
3. National Defence University, Malaysia
4. Yogyakarta State University, Indonesia
Abstract
This study aims to develop the DONE Model approach for teaching and learning in Physical Education and Health Education. The model is built on the foundation of higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) and Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy. The research design employs a one-shot case study method involving 9 expert panels to assess validity and 30 Physical Education and Health Education teachers for a pilot study to evaluate the DONE Model. Library research was conducted to establish the DONE Model approach, which consists of four main constructs: Direction, Observation, Nomination, and Evaluation. The validity analysis, using the Content Validity Index (CVI), demonstrates an acceptable value of 0.89 for the four constructs in the DONE Model. Reliability assessment through a pilot study, based on four constructs (content, understanding, clarity, and ease of use), indicates that the developed DONE Model has Cronbach’s Alpha reliability values ranging from 0.88 (high) to 0.90 (very high). Overall, the DONE Model serves as a valuable guide for Physical Education and Health Education teachers, offering an effective method for delivering learning content based on topic appropriateness.
Publisher
DJ Studio Dariusz Jasinski
Reference12 articles.
1. Ariffin N. A., & Yunus F. (2017). Kesediaan guru prasekolah dalam melaksanakan KBAT dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. Simposium Pendidikan diPeribadikan: Perspektif Risalah An-Nur (SPRiN2017).
2. Salehudin N.N., Hassan N.N., & Hamid N.A.A. (2015). Matematik dan Kemahiran Abad Ke-21: Perspektif Murid. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik. Vol. 3 Bil.1 24-36. ISSN 2331-9425.
3. Anderson L. W., & Krathwohl D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman, New York.
4. Radmehr F., & Drake M. (2019). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy and major theories and frameworks that influence the teaching, learning, and assessment of mathematics: a comparison. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(6), 895-920.
5. Gay L. R., Mills G. E., & Airasian P. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Columbus: Merrill Greenwood.