Economic Evaluation of Global Endometrial Ablation Versus Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomy for Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: US Commercial and Medicaid Payer Perspectives-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Economic Evaluation of Global Endometrial Ablation Versus Inpatient and Outpatient Hysterectomy for Treatment of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: US Commercial and Medicaid Payer Perspectives

Published:2018-04 Issue:S1 Volume:21 Page:S-1-S-12
ISSN:1942-7891
Container-title:Population Health Management
language:en
Short-container-title:Population Health Management

Author:

Miller Jeffrey D.¹,Bonafede Machaon M.¹,Cai Qian¹,Pohlman Scott K.²,Troeger Kathleen A.²,Cholkeri-Singh Aarathi³

Affiliation:

1. Truven Health Analytics, an IBM Company, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

2. Hologic, Inc., Marlborough, Massachusetts.

3. The Advanced Gynecologic Surgery Institute, Naperville, Illinois.

Publisher

Mary Ann Liebert Inc

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Link

https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/pdf/10.1089/pop.2017.0172

Reference31 articles.

1. Practice Bulletin No. 136

2. Practice Bulletin No. 128

3. Management of heavy menstrual bleeding in general practice

4. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Comparison of Combined Bipolar Radiofrequency Impedance-Controlled Endometrial Ablation with Levonorgestrel Intrauterine System versus Bipolar Radiofrequency Endometrial Ablation Alone in Women with Abnormal Uterine Bleeding;Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology;2020-03

2. Employer-perspective cost comparison of surgical treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding;Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research;2020-01