Understanding Walking via Surveys and Route Evaluations in Geographic Information System (GIS) Environment

Author:

TUYDES-YAMAN Hediye1,KARATAŞ SEVİNEN Pınar1,ONCU Zeynep Pinar2,DALKİC Gulcin1

Affiliation:

1. ORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ

2. Garage Atlas Tasarım Teknoloji Anonim Şirketi

Abstract

Walking is a critical mode to be encouraged in sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs). However, the lack of analysis methodology is making it challenging to detect walkability aspects necessary to develop better policies. Middle East Technical University (METU) Campus was designed with a pedestrian-friendly layout which has been threatened recently by different factors (i.e. enlargement of the campus, changing traffic volumes, etc.). This necessitated further investatigation of walking and walkability in the campus, which was the main scope of the most recent survey, designed to investigate a) pedestrian perspective and b) walking limits on campus. While the former was investigated via traditional questions, the latter was sought after via map-based 1844 routes from 623 participating students. Besides the descriptive statistics performed by the responses to the traditional evaluation questions, the route-based data resulted in enriched analyses, proving the power of the latter in evaluating walkability, which has a spatial variation by nature. Consideration of both traditional survey approach accompanied by the route-based investigations enabled the development of a more comprehensive understanding of walkability of the study area, which should be used in evaluation of pedestrian mobility in urban pedestrian analysis zones, i.e. city centers, metro station capture zones, campuses, etc.

Publisher

Kocaeli Journal of Science and Engineering

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences,General Environmental Science

Reference35 articles.

1. 1- Litman, T. Economic Value of Walkability. 2003. Transportation Research Record 1828 (1): 3–11. doi:10.3141/1828-01.

2. 2- Abley, S. 2005. Walkability Scoping Paper. Retrieved March, no. February 2.

3. 3- TuydesYaman, H., Karatas, P. and Altintasi, O. 2015. Lessons Learnt from METU Campus Walkability Evaluations, Transportation Research Board (TRB) 94th Annual Meeting, 11-15 January.

4. 4- Karatas, P. and TuydesYaman, H. 2016. A pairwise Comparison of Different Pedestrian Level of Service (PLOS) Ratings, In Transportation Research Board (TRB) 95th Annual Meeting, 8-12 January.

5. 5- Manaugh, K., and El-Geneidy. 2011. A. Validating Walkability Indices: How Do Different Households Respond to the Walkability of Their Neighborhood?. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 16 (4). Elsevier Ltd: 309–15. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3