Endobronchial Coil System versus Standard-of-Care Medical Management in the Treatment of Subjects with Severe Emphysema

Author:

Klooster Karin,Valipour Arschang,Marquette Charles-HugoORCID,Boutros JacquesORCID,Mal Hervé,Marceau Armelle,Shah Pallav L.ORCID,Conway Francesca,Deslée Gaëtan,Bourdin Arnaud,Pison Christophe,Grah Christian,Hetzel Martin,Schumann Christian,Kessler RomainORCID,Huebner Ralf-Harto,Skowasch Dirk,Darwiche KaidORCID,Hammerl Peter,Stanzel Franz,Bezzi Michaela,Dutau Hervé,Herth Felix J.F.,Slebos Dirk-Jan

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction using endobronchial coils is a new treatment for patients with severe emphysema. To date, the benefits have been modest and have been suggested to be much larger in patients with severe hyperinflation and nonmulti-comorbidity. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endobronchial coil treatment in a randomized multicenter clinical trial using optimized patient selection. <b><i>Method:</i></b> Patients with severe emphysema on HRCT scan with severe hyperinflation (residual volume [RV] ≥200% predicted and RV/total lung capacity [TLC] &#x3e;55%) were randomized to coil treatment or control. Primary outcome measures were differences in the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV<sub>1</sub>) and St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score at 6 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Due to premature study termination, a total of 120 patients (age 63 ± 7 years, FEV<sub>1</sub> 29 ± 7% predicted, RV 251 ± 41% predicted, RV/TLC 67 ± 6%, and SGRQ 58 ± 13 points), instead of 210 patients, were randomized. At study termination, 91 patients (57 coil and 34 control) had 6-month results available. Analyses showed significantly greater improvements in favor of the coil group. The increase in FEV<sub>1</sub> was greater in the coil group than that in the control group by + 10.3 [+4.7 to +16.0] % and in SGRQ by −10.6 [−15.9 to −5.4] points. At study termination, there were 5 (6.8%) deaths in the coil cohort reported. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Despite early study termination, coil treatment compared to control results in a significant improvement in the lung function and quality of life benefits for up to 6 months in patients with emphysema and severe hyperinflation. These improvements were of clinical importance but were associated with a higher likelihood of serious adverse events.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Reference11 articles.

1. Deslée G, Mal H, Dutau H, Bourdin A, Vergnon JM, Pison C, et al. Lung volume reduction coil treatment vs usual care in patients with severe emphysema: the REVOLENS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(2):175–84.

2. Sciurba FC, Criner GJ, Strange C, Shah PL, Michaud G, Connolly TA, et al. Effect of endobronchial coils vs usual care on exercise tolerance in patients with severe emphysema: the renew randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(20):2178–89.

3. Slebos DJ, Hartman JE, Klooster K, Blaas S, Deslee G, Gesierich W, et al. Bronchoscopic coil treatment for patients with severe emphysema: a meta-analysis. Respiration. 2015;90(2):136–45.

4. Shah PL, Zoumot Z, Singh S, Bicknell SR, Ross ET, Quiring J, et al. Endobronchial coils for the treatment of severe emphysema with hyperinflation (RESET): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2013;1(3):233–40.

5. Hartman JE, Shah PL, Sciurba F, Herth FJF, Slebos DJ. Endobronchial coils for emphysema: dual mechanism of action on lobar residual volume reduction. Respirology. 2020;25(11):1160–6.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3