Improving Accuracy of In-the-bag Intraocular Lens Power Calculation in Adult Eyes with Unilateral Subluxated Lenses by Using the Anterior Chamber Depth of the Unaffected Eye

Author:

Lou Wei,Chen Ziang,Huang Yang,Jin Haiying

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to determine the interchangeability of bilateral anterior chamber depth (ACD) in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations for cataractous eyes and refractive outcomes using the unaffected fellow-eye ACD in lens subluxation. Methods: The predicted postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) calculated using the Kane formula with and without fellow-eye ACD in 202 cataract patients was compared. Refractive outcomes of the newer formulas (the Kane, Barrett Universal II (BUII), and Pearl-DGS formulas) with affected-eye ACD and with unaffected fellow-eye ACD were compared in 33 eyes with lens subluxation (the affected eye) undergoing in-the-bag IOL implantation. The SD of the prediction error (PE) was assessed using the heteroscedastic method. Results: In 202 paired cataractous eyes, no marked ACD difference was found bilaterally; the predicted SE obtained without the fellow-eye ACD was comparable with that calculated with the fellow-eye one (P = .90), with a mean absolute difference of 0.03 ± 0.03D. With the affected-eye AL, keratometry, and ACD, the median absolute error (MedAE) was 0.38-0.64D, and the percentage of PE within ±0.50D was 30.30-57.58%. The unaffected-eye ACD improved the results (MedAE, 0.35-0.49D; the percentage of PE within ±0.50D, 54.55-63.64%). The SDs of the BUII (0.82D) and Pearl-DGS formulas (0.87D) with the affected-eye ACD were significantly larger than those of the Kane and Pearl-DGS formulas (both 0.69D) with the unaffected-eye ACD. Conclusion: Bilateral ACD was interchangeable in IOL power calculation for cataractous eyes. Unaffected-eye ACD in lieu of affected-eye ACD can enhance the accuracy of newer formulas in patients with unilateral subluxated lenses undergoing in-the-bag IOL implantation.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3