Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Does Not Affect Functional Outcomes during Bilateral Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> A possible association between extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) in radical prostatectomy (RPE) and functional outcomes such as erectile function (EF) and continence recovery has been previously considered. This association stems from the direct proximity of ePLND to the pelvic plexus. In this paper, we aimed to critically examine an association of ePLND with functional outcomes in patients who underwent bilateral nerve-sparing RPE. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> 272 out of 782 patients from a randomized, patient-blinded, multicenter trial were retrospectively classified into two groups based on the D’Amico criteria: 114 had no PLND and 158 had ePLND. Continence (no pad/safety pad) and EF (Index of Erectile Function-5 [IIEF-5] questionnaire ≥17; sufficient erection for sexual intercourse) were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months as well as postsurgical complications (Clavien-Dindo Classification). <b><i>Results:</i></b> After 12 months of follow-up, no significant difference for potency could be found between men without and subjected to ePLND: IIEF-5 ≥17 (23.2% vs. 27.2%; <i>p</i> = 0.55) and sufficient erection for intercourse (44.1% vs. 45.6%; <i>p</i> = 0.84). A multiple linear regression analysis demonstrated that while preoperative EF (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), pathological tumor stage (<i>p</i> = 0.027), and robot-assisted bilateral nerve-sparing RPE (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001) were independent predictors of EF recovery, the same did not apply to ePLND. No association was detected for continence recovery (94.2% vs. 89.7%; <i>p</i> = 0.22) and complications of any grade after surgery (11.4% vs. 16.5%; <i>p</i> = 0.24). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> ePLND is not associated with increased risk of erectile dysfunction, incontinence or complications after bilateral nerve-sparing RPE.