Affiliation:
1. University of Kent , Canterbury, UK; b Centre for General Linguistics and Humboldt University , Berlin, Germany; c West Pomeranian University of Technology , Szczecin , Poland
Abstract
Abstract
Two calling melodies of Polish were investigated, the routine call, used to call someone for an everyday reason, and the urgent call, which conveys disapproval of the addressee's actions. A Discourse Completion Task was used to elicit the two melodies from Polish speakers using twelve names from one to four syllables long; there were three names per syllable count, and speakers produced three tokens of each name with each melody. The results, based on eleven speakers, show that the routine calling melody consists of a low F0 stretch followed by a rise-fall-rise; the urgent calling melody, on the other hand, is a simple rise-fall. Systematic differences were found in the scaling and alignment of tonal targets: the routine call showed late alignment of the accentual pitch peak, and in most instances lower scaling of targets. The accented vowel was also affected, being overall louder in the urgent call. Based on the data and comparisons with other Polish melodies, we analyze the routine call as LH* !H-H% and the urgent call as H* L-L%. We discuss the results and our analysis in light of recent findings on calling melodies in other languages, and explore their repercussions for intonational phonology and the modeling of intonation.
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Acoustics and Ultrasonics,Language and Linguistics
Reference52 articles.
1. Arvaniti A (2011): The representation of intonation; in van Oostendorp M, Ewen CJ, Hume E, Rice K (eds): Companion to Phonology. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford.
2. Arvaniti A (2016): Analytical decisions in intonation research and the role of representations: lessons from Romani. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 7:1-43.
3. Arvaniti A, Baltazani M (2005): Intonational analysis and prosodic annotation of Greek spoken corpora; in Jun S-A (ed): Prosodic Typology: The Phonology of Intonation and Phrasing. Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp 84-117.
4. Arvaniti A, Ladd DR, Mennen I (2006): Tonal association and tonal alignment: evidence from Greek polar questions and contrastive statements. Lang Speech 49(pt 4):421-450.
5. Arvaniti A, Garding G (2007): Dialectal variation in the rising accents of American English; in Cole J, Hualde JI (eds): Papers in Laboratory Phonology 9. Berlin, New York, Mouton de Gruyter, pp 547-576.
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献