Effects of Using Epidural Analgesia during Delivery on Maternal and Infant Outcomes

Author:

Shuai Fei,Jia Junxiang,Lin Peng

Abstract

<b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of the study was to estimate the impact of epidural analgesia (EA) during delivery on maternal and infant outcomes. <b><i>Design:</i></b> This was a prospective cohort study. <b><i>Participants:</i></b> In total, 159 pregnant multiparas in Women and Children’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University from November 2019 to May 2020 were enrolled. Patients were divided into the EA group (<i>n</i> = 80) and no analgesia group (<i>n</i> = 79) based on the choice of the parturients. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The duration of labor, levels of umbilical arterial blood gas (pH and partial pressure oxygen), visual analog score (VAS), and adverse events were evaluated to compare differences between the EA group and no analgesia group, respectively. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The duration of labor was prolonged in the entire labor (<i>p</i> = 0.002), and the first stage (<i>p</i> = 0.001) in the EA group compared with the no analgesia group. The second stage of labor and third stage of labor, levels of umbilical arterial blood gas, and 1-min Apgar score in neonates were similar in EA and no analgesia groups (All <i>p</i> &#x3e; 0.05). After adjusting age, prepregnancy body mass index, and past and present medical history, the VAS was low in the EA group compared with the no analgesia group when the uterine orifice was completely open (odds ratio [OR] = 0.001, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.001–0.002), 8 h postdelivery (OR = 0.508, 95% CI: 0.264–0.977), and 24 h postdelivery (OR = 0.321, 95% CI: 0.167–0.617). EA increased the proportion of adverse events occurring 5 min postdelivery (χ<sup>2</sup> = 10.137, <i>p</i> = 0.001), while decreased the proportion of adverse events occurring 24 h postdelivery (χ<sup>2</sup> = 4.750, <i>p</i> = 0.029). <b><i>Limitations:</i></b> In terms of the effects of EA on neonates, we only measured the 1-min Apgar score of neonates. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> EA might be a reliable pain relief method for pregnant women. The results of our study might give a reference for the use of EA during delivery in clinic.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Obstetrics and Gynecology,Reproductive Medicine

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3