Utilization of Interdisciplinary Tumor Boards for Sarcoma Care in Germany: Results from the PROSa Study
-
Published:2021
Issue:6
Volume:44
Page:301-312
-
ISSN:2296-5270
-
Container-title:Oncology Research and Treatment
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Oncol Res Treat
Author:
Eichler MartinORCID, Andreou Dimosthenis, Golcher Henriette, Hentschel Leopold, Richter Stephan, Hohenberger Peter, Kasper BerndORCID, Pink DanielORCID, Jakob Jens, Ashmawy Hany, Hettmer Simone, Tuchscherer Armin, Grube Matthias, Heidt Vitali, Jentsch Christina, Pablik Jessica, Wardelmann Eva, Kreitner Karl-Friedrich, Kneser Ulrich, Tonus Carolin, Wimberger Pauline, Schoffer OlafORCID, Reichardt Peter, Wartenberg Markus, Eberlein-Gonska Maria, Bornhäuser Martin, Schmitt Jochen, Schuler Markus K.
Abstract
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Data on institutional structures of sarcoma care in Germany are scarce. The utilization of an interdisciplinary tumor board (IDTB) is an essential part of modern cancer care. We investigated to which extent and when IDTB are used in sarcoma care. We hypothesized that IDTB before treatment initiation were used more often at certified cancer centers and at high-volume centers and that IDTB utilization increased over time. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> From 2017 to 2020 we conducted a prospective cohort study, undertaking major efforts to include the whole spectrum of sarcoma treatment facilities. To analyze potential predictors of IDTB utilization, we calculated multivariable logistic regressions. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Patients and survivors (<i>n</i> = 1,309) from 39 study centers (22 tertiary referral hospitals, 9 other hospitals, and 8 office-based practices) participated; 88.3% of the patients were discussed at some stage of their disease in an IDTB (56.1% before treatment, 78% after therapy, and 85.9% in metastatic disease). Hypotheses were confirmed regarding the utilization of IDTB in certified cancer centers (vs. all others: OR = 5.39; 95% CI 3.28–8.85) and the time of diagnosis (2018/2019 vs. until 2013: OR = 4.95; 95% CI 2.67–9.21). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b><i></i>Our study adds to the evidence regarding the institutional structures of sarcoma care in Germany. Utilization of a tumor board before therapy seems to be in an implementation process that is making progress but is far from complete. Certification is a possible tool to accelerate this development.
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology,Hematology
Reference14 articles.
1. Andritsch E, Beishon M, Bielack S, Bonvalot S, Casali P, Crul M, et al. ECCO essential requirements for quality cancer care: soft tissue sarcoma in adults and bone sarcoma – A critical review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2017 Feb;110:94–105. 2. Casali PG, Abecassis N, Aro HT, Bauer S, Biagini R, Bielack S, et al.; ESMO Guidelines Committee and EURACAN. Soft tissue and visceral sarcomas: ESMO-EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018 Oct;29 suppl 4:iv51–67. 3. Dangoor A, Seddon B, Gerrand C, Grimer R, Whelan J, Judson I. UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas. Clin Sarcoma Res. 2016 Nov;6(1):20. 4. von Mehren M, Randall RL, Benjamin RS, Boles S, Bui MM, Conrad EU 3rd, et al. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2016, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jun;14(6):758–86. 5. Canter RJ, Smith CA, Martinez SR, Goodnight JE Jr, Bold RJ, Wisner DH. Extremity soft tissue tumor surgery by surgical specialty: a comparison of case volume among oncology and non-oncology-designated surgeons. J Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;108(3):142–7.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|