Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography as a Novel Diagnostic Method for the Assessment of Hardness and Depth of Invasion in Colorectal Neoplasms

Author:

Esaki Masaya,Yamamura TakeshiORCID,Nakamura Masanao,Maeda Keiko,Sawada Tsunaki,Mizutani Yasuyuki,Ishikawa Eri,Suzuki Hiroto,Kuno Takeshi,Yamada Kentaro,Hasegawa Issei,Ishikawa TakuyaORCID,Kakushima Naomi,Furukawa Kazuhiro,Ohno Eizaburo,Kawashima Hiroki,Hirooka Yoshiki,Fujishiro Mitsuhiro

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> We aimed to compare the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound elastography (EUS-EG) with that of magnifying chromoendoscopy (MCE) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for the diagnosis of the depth of invasion in colorectal neoplasms. This is an important clinical issue as the depth of invasion is associated with the risk of metastasis. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Consecutive patients with suspected superficial colorectal neoplasms, evaluated by MCE, EUS, and EUS-EG, for whom endoscopic submucosal dissection was considered, were enrolled in 2018 (derivation study) and in 2019–2020 (validation study). The primary clinical endpoint was the diagnostic yield differentiating intramucosal and shallow submucosal neoplasms from deep submucosal (dSM) and advanced colorectal cancers. In addition, inter- and intra-observer agreements of the elastic score of colorectal neoplasm (ES-CRN) were evaluated by 2 expert and 2 non-expert endoscopists. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Thirty-one (33 lesions) and 50 (55 lesions) patients were enrolled in the derivation and validation studies, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values, and accuracy of assessment of the depth of submucosal or deeper invasion in the derivation and validation groups were as follows: EUS-EG, 100/88.2/86.7/100/93.3% and 77.8/86.1/73.7/88.6/83.3%; MCE, 66.7/94.4/90.9/77.3/81.8% and 84.2/91.4/84.2/91.4/88.9%; and EUS, 93.3/77.8/77.8/93.3/84.8% and 89.5/65.7/58.6/92.0/74.1%, respectively. For the 2 expert endoscopists, interobserver agreement for the ES-CRN (first and second assessments) in the derivation group was 0.84 and 0.78, respectively; these values were 0.73 and 0.49, respectively, for the 2 non-expert endoscopists. <b><i>Discussion/Conclusion:</i></b> All 3 modalities presented similar diagnostic yield. Inter- and intra-observer agreements of the ES-CRN were substantial, even for non-expert endoscopists. Therefore, EUS-EG may be a useful modality in determining the depth of invasion in colorectal neoplasms.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Gastroenterology

Reference33 articles.

1. Hurlstone DP, Sanders DS, Cross SS, Adam I, Shorthouse AJ, Brown S, et al. Colonoscopic resection of lateral spreading tumours: a prospective analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection. Gut. 2004 Sep;53(9):1334–9.

2. Luigiano C, Consolo P, Scaffidi MG, Strangio G, Giacobbe G, Alibrandi A, et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection for large and giant sessile and flat colorectal polyps: a single-center experience with long-term follow-up. Endoscopy. 2009 Aug;41(10):829–35.

3. Nakajima T, Saito Y, Tanaka S, Iishi H, Kudo S, Ikematsu H, et al. Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan. Surg Endosc. 2013 March;27(9):3262–70.

4. Fujimori T, Kawamata H, Kashida H. Precancerous lesions of the colorectum. J Gastroenterol. 2001 Sep;36(9):587–94.

5. Tanaka S, Haruma K, Teixeira CR, Tatsuta S, Ohtsu N, Hiraga Y, et al. Endoscopic treatment of submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma with special reference to risk factors for lymph node metastasis. J Gastroenterol. 1995 Dec;30(6):710–7.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3