Auditory-Perceptual Assessments of Cough: Characterizing Rater Reliability and the Effects of a Standardized Training Protocol

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Auditory-perceptual assessments of cough are commonly used by speech-language pathologists working with people with swallowing disorders with emerging evidence beginning to demonstrate their validity; however, their reliability among novice clinicians is unknown. Therefore, the primary aim of this study was to characterize the reliability of auditory-perceptual assessments of cough among a group of novice clinicians. As a secondary aim, we assessed the effects of a standardized training protocol on the reliability of auditory-perceptual assessments of cough. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Twelve novice clinicians blindly rated ten auditory-perceptual cough descriptors for 120 cough audio clips. Standardized training was then completed by the group of clinicians. The same cough audio clips were then re-randomized and blindly rated. Reliability was analyzed pre- and post-training within each clinician (intra-rater), between each unique pair of raters (dyad-level inter-rater), and for the entire group of raters (group-level inter-rater) using intraclass correlation coefficients and Cohen’s Kappa. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Pre-training reliability was greatest for measures of strength, effectiveness, and normality and lowest when judging the type of expiratory maneuver (cough, throat clear, huff, other). The measures that improved the most with training were ratings of perceived crispness, amount of voicing, and type of expiratory maneuver. Intra-rater reliability coefficients ranged from 0.580 to 0.903 pre-training and 0.756–0.904 post-training. Dyad-level inter-rater reliability coefficients ranged from 0.295 to 0.745 pre-training and 0.450–0.804 post-training. Group-level inter-rater reliability coefficients ranged from 0.454 to 0.919 pre-training and 0.558–0.948 post-training. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Reliability of auditory-perceptual assessments varied across perceptual cough descriptors, but all appeared within the range of what has been historically reported for auditory-perceptual assessments of voice and visual-perceptual assessments of swallowing and cough airflow. Reliability improved for most cough descriptors following 30–60 min of standardized training. Future research is needed to examine the validity of auditory-perceptual assessments of cough by assessing the relationship between perceptual cough descriptors and instrumental measures of cough effectiveness to better understand the role of perceptual assessments in clinical practice.