Investigating the Contribution of Decision-Making, Cognitive Insight, and Theory of Mind in Insight in Schizophrenia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Lopez-Morinigo Javier-David,Escobedo-Aedo Paula-JhoanaORCID,Sánchez-Escribano Martínez AdelaORCID,González Ruiz-Ruano VerónicaORCID,Sánchez-Alonso Sergio,Mata-Iturralde Laura,Muñoz-Lorenzo Laura,Baca-García EnriqueORCID,David Anthony S.ORCID

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Insight in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSD) is associated with outcomes. Although the neurocognitive basis of insight is widely accepted, the specific contribution of decision-making (Jumping to Conclusions [JTC]), Cognitive Insight (CI), and Theory of Mind (ToM) to insight remains unclear. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> The sample included <i>N</i> = 77 SSD outpatients aged 18–64 years from a randomized controlled trial of metacognitive training. Assessments included JTC-Beads Task, CI-Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, ToM-Hinting Task, and the Emotions Recognition Test Faces. Statistics: hierarchical multivariable linear regression models tested their contribution to total insight (TI) and three insight dimensions – illness recognition (IR), symptom relabelling (SR), and treatment compliance (TC) – measured with the Schedule for the Assessment of Insight – Expanded version, whilst adjusting for potential confounders. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Bivariate analyses showed that CI was associated with TI (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> change = 0.214; <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), IR (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> change = 0.154; <i>p</i> = 0.003), and SR (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> change = 0.168; <i>p</i> = 0.003), while JTC predicted IR (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> change = 0.790; <i>p</i> = 0.020). Multivariable regression models showed that CI predicted TI (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> change = 0.116; <i>p</i> = 0.036) and SR (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> change = 0.166, <i>p</i> = 0.011), whereas JTC was linked with IR (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> change = 0.710; <i>p</i> = 0.026). ToM was not linked with any insight score. No cognitive variable was associated with treatment compliance. <b><i>Discussion:</i></b> Results supported the (meta)cognitive model of insight in SSD. JTC and CI emerged as the main (meta)cognitive processes underlying insight. Metacognitive interventions may therefore improve insight in SSD, although these therapies alone may fail to address treatment compliance.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3