Quantitative Autofluorescence at AMD’s Beginnings Highlights Retinal Topography and Grading System Differences: ALSTAR2 Baseline

Author:

Berlin Andreas,Fischer Nathan A.,Clark Mark E.,Kar Deepayan,Swain Thomas A.,Martindale Richard M.,McGwin Jr Gerald,Crosson Jason N.,Sloan Kenneth R.,Owsley Cynthia,Curcio Christine A.

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The aims of the study were to describe baseline quantitative (short-wavelength) autofluorescence (qAF) findings in a large pseudophakic cohort at age-related macular degeneration (AMD)’s beginnings and to assess qAF8 as an outcome measure and evaluate Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) and Beckman grading systems. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In the ALSTAR2 baseline cohort (NCT04112667), 346 pseudophakic eyes of 188 persons (74.0 ± 5.5 years) were classified as normal (<i>N</i> = 160 by AREDS, 158 by Beckman), early AMD (eAMD) (<i>N</i> = 104, 66), and intermediate AMD (iAMD) (<i>N</i> = 82, 122). Groups were compared via mean qAF intensities in a 6°–8° annulus (qAF8) and maps of differences between observations and the overall mean, divided by standard deviation (Z-score). <b><i>Results:</i></b> qAF8 did not differ significantly among diagnostic groups by either stratification (<i>p</i> = 0.0869 AREDS; <i>p</i> = 0.0569 by Beckman). Notably, 45 eyes considered eAMD by AREDS became iAMD by Beckman. For AREDS-stratified eyes, <i>Z</i>-score maps showed higher centrally located qAF for normal, near the mean in eAMD, and lower values for iAMD. Maps deviated from this pattern for Beckman-stratified eyes. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In a large sample of pseudophakic eyes, qAF8 does not differ overall from normal aging to iAMD but also does not capture the earliest AMD activity in the macula lutea. AREDS classification gives results more consistent with a slow decline in histologic autofluorescence than Beckman classification.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Biomarkers in age‐related macular degeneration;Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology;2024-05

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3