Objective Thoracoscopic Criteria in Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Pleural Effusions

Author:

Ellayeh MohamedORCID,Bedawi Eihab,Banka Radhika,Sundaralingam Anand,George Vineeth,Kanellakis Nikolaos,Hallifax Robert,Abdelwahab Heba,Rezk Nasef,Hewidy Asem,Ali Raed,Wrightson John,Rahman Najib

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Thoracoscopy is the “gold standard” diagnostic modality for investigation of suspected pleural malignancy. It is postulated that meticulous assessment of the pleural cavity may be adequate to indicate malignancy through the macroscopic findings of nodules, pleural thickening, and lymphangitis. We attempted to critically assess this practice, by precisely defining objective macroscopic criteria which might differentiate benign from malignant pleural diseases according to intrapleural pattern and anatomical location, and thereby to explore the predilection of abnormalities to specific sites on pleural surfaces. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A structured review of recorded video footage from medical thoracoscopy procedures in 96 patients was conducted by 2 independent assessors. Abnormalities were scored on agreed, objective criteria for the presence of nodules, lymphangitis and inflammation on each of the costoparietal, visceral and diaphragmatic surfaces. The costoparietal pleura was divided into 6 levels (apical, middle, and inferior surfaces of the lateral and posterior parietal pleura). The anterior surface of the costoparietal pleura was excluded from analysis after interim review as this surface was rarely seen. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In the benign group, inflammation was the predominant finding in 65% (<i>n</i> = 33; costoparietal), 44% (<i>n</i> = 21; visceral), and 42% (<i>n</i> = 15; diaphragmatic). Nodules were detected in 24% (<i>n</i> = 12; costoparietal), 8% (<i>n</i> = 4; visceral), and 8% (<i>n</i> = 3; diaphragmatic). The most affected surfaces with inflammation were the middle lateral (60%) and the inferior lateral (57.8%) parts of the costoparietal pleura. In the malignant group, nodules were the predominant finding according to surface in 73% (<i>n</i> = 33; costoparietal), 32% (<i>n</i> = 13; visceral) and 48% (<i>n</i> = 17; diaphragmatic). Inflammation was detected in 44% (<i>n</i> = 20; costoparietal), 25% (<i>n</i> = 10; visceral), and 29% (<i>n</i> = 10; diaphragmatic). The most affected surfaces with nodules were the middle lateral (67.4%) and inferior lateral (66.7%) costoparietal pleural surfaces. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This is the first detailed, anatomical description of abnormalities in the pleural space during thoracoscopy. While nodules were the predominant pattern in malignant pleural effusion, they were detected in 24% of benign diagnoses. Detection of nodules in &#x3e;1 area of the costoparietal pleura was in favor of a malignant diagnosis. Inflammation was the predominant pattern in benign pleural effusion. Our results suggest that macroscopic nodules in malignant diagnoses have a predilection for the middle and inferior surfaces of the lateral costoparietal pleura.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

Subject

Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Dancel R, Schnobrich D, Puri N, Franco-Sadud R, Cho J, Grikis L, et al. Recommendations on the use of ultrasound guidance for adult thoracentesis: a position statement of the Society of Hospital Medicine. J Hosp Med. 2018;13(2):126–35.

2. Asciak R, Rahman NM. Malignant pleural effusion: from diagnostics to therapeutics. Clin Chest Med. 2018 Mar;39(1):181–93.

3. Zhang X, Duan H, Yu Y, Ma C, Ren Z, Lei Y, et al. Differential diagnosis between benign and malignant pleural effusion with dual-energy spectral CT. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0193714.

4. Rahman NM, Ali NJ, Brown G, Chapman SJ, Davies RJ, Downer NJ, et al. Local anaesthetic thoracoscopy: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 2):ii54–60.

5. Antony VB, Loddenkemper R, Astoul P, Boutin C, Goldstraw P, Hott J, et al. Management of malignant pleural effusions. Eur Respir J. 2001;18(2):402–19.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3