Correcting for Plasma Aldosterone Improves the Accuracy of Repeated Timed Urine Sampling for Estimation of Dietary Sodium Intake

Author:

van Vliet Anne Myrthe C.,Vogt Liffert,Ginos Bigina N.R.,Frings-Meuthen Petra,Heer Martina,Olde Engberink Rik H.G.

Abstract

Introduction: Long-term sodium balance studies show that sodium can be temporarily stored and released in tissues, mediated by circaseptan rhythms of aldosterone and cortisol. This complicates the reliability of a single 24-h urine collection to estimate individual sodium intake. We investigated whether repeated timed urine collection with and without correction for plasma aldosterone is a more accurate alternative for estimating daily sodium intake. Methods: We conducted a post hoc analysis of a metabolic ward study in which 16 healthy male adults consumed a diet with a fixed sodium content (50 or 200 mmol/day) for 7 days. Each day, urine was collected in 4 intervals (7:00–13:00 h, 13:00–19:00 h, 19:00–23:00 h, and 23:00–07:00 h). Plasma aldosterone was measured at 6:30 h, 12:30 h, and 18:30 h. Sodium intakes were estimated by various formulas using 3 timed urines of day 5–7. Results: During a 200-mmol daily sodium intake, sodium intake estimates based on three repeated timed urine samples and the Toft equation differed 10 [IQR: 3–14], 8 [6–19], 36 [16–49], and 20 [10–43] mmol from the actual intake for intervals 7:00–13:00 h, 13:00–19:00 h, 19:00–23:00 h, 23:00–7:00 h, respectively. These measurements did not significantly differ from a single 24-h urine (20 [12–55] mmol). During a 50-mmol daily sodium intake, repeated timed urine collection performed worse than a single 24-h urine collection. On both diets, correction for plasma aldosterone increased accuracy and sodium intake estimates were significantly more accurate than a single 24-h urine. Conclusion: In a controlled environment, repeated timed urine collection corrected for plasma aldosterone is more accurate than a single 24-h urine collection.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3