The Agreement between Consumer-Driven Self-Assessment of Psoriasis Severity and Physician-Assessed Severity Based on Patient-Taken Photographs Is Weak: A Cross-Sectional Study

Author:

Ali Zarqa,Al-Mousawi Ali,Björnsson Benóný Þór,Egeberg Alexander,Riemer Christian,Thomsen Simon Francis

Abstract

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Digital advancements have given access to huge amounts of real-world data (RWD) widely used for dermatological research. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The objective of this study was to investigate the agreement between consumer-driven self-assessed psoriasis severity and physician-assessed severity based on photographs. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Customer IDs in the NØIE database (Danish skincare company) from 2009 to 2022 with a smartphone photograph of psoriasis vulgaris on the body and a corresponding completed questionnaire were included. Smartphone photographs were evaluated by a physician-assessing erythema, induration, and scaling on a scale from 0 to 4 based on Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). Self-assessment was done on a scale from 0 to 10 and converted to 0–4 scale (0 converted to 0; 1–3 to 1; 4–6 to 2; 7–8 to 3; and 9–10 to 4). Intraclass correlation coefficients with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> In total, 187 patients (63% women) with mean age of 38 years were included. Self-assessment scores were higher than physicians’ assessment scores for all groups, and scaling was closest to the physicians’ assessment, while erythema and induration had a greater distance between the physicians’ and patients’ assessment. The correlation between self-assessed and physician-assessed psoriasis severity for all patients was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.0–0.92); 0.34 (95% CI: 0.0–0.95) for chronic patients; and 0.09 (−0.01 to 0.82) for non-chronic patients. The agreement was better for men (0.53 [−0.02 to 0.98]) than for women (0.12 [−0.01 to 0.84]). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> There was weak agreement between self-assessed psoriasis severity and photographically assessed severity by the physician. Consumer-driven RWD should be interpreted with caution.

Publisher

S. Karger AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3