Author:
Shahin Omar A.,Chifotides Helen T.,Bose Prithviraj,Masarova Lucia,Verstovsek Srdan
Abstract
<b><i>Background:</i></b> Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) can transform into blast phase MPN (leukemic transformation; MPN-BP), typically via accelerated phase MPN (MPN-AP), in ∼20–25% of the cases. MPN-AP and MPN-BP are characterized by 10–19% and ≥20% blasts, respectively. MPN-AP/BP portend a dismal prognosis with no established conventional treatment. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is the sole modality associated with long-term survival. <b><i>Summary:</i></b> MPN-AP/BP has a markedly different mutational profile from <i>de novo</i> acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In MPN-AP/BP, <i>TP53</i> and <i>IDH1/2</i> are more frequent, whereas <i>FLT3</i> and <i>DNMT3A</i> are rare. Higher incidence of leukemic transformation has been associated with the most aggressive MPN subtype, myelofibrosis (MF); other risk factors for leukemic transformation include rising blast counts above 3–5%, advanced age, severe anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukocytosis, increasing bone marrow fibrosis, type 1 <i>CALR</i>-unmutated status, lack of driver mutations (negative for <i>JAK2, CALR,</i> or <i>MPL</i> genes), adverse cytogenetics, and acquisition of ≥2 high-molecular risk mutations (<i>ASXL1, EZH2, IDH1/2, SRSF2</i>, and <i>U2AF1</i><sup>Q157</sup>). The aforementioned factors have been incorporated in several novel prognostic scoring systems for MF. Currently, elderly/unfit patients with MPN-AP/BP are treated with hypomethylating agents with/without ruxolitinib; these regimens appear to confer comparable benefit to intensive chemotherapy but with lower toxicity. Retrospective studies in patients who acquired actionable mutations during MPN-AP/BP showed positive outcomes with targeted AML treatments, such as IDH1/2 inhibitors, and require further evaluation in clinical trials. <b><i>Key Messages:</i></b> Therapy for MPN-AP patients represents an unmet medical need. MF patients, in particular, should be appropriately stratified regarding their prognosis and the risk for transformation. Higher-risk patients should be monitored regularly and treated prior to progression to MPN-BP. MPN-AP patients may be treated with hypomethylating agents alone or in combination with ruxolitinib; also, patients can be provided with the option to enroll in rationally designed clinical trials exploring combination regimens, including novel targeted drugs, with an ultimate goal to transition to transplant.
Subject
Hematology,General Medicine
Reference133 articles.
1. Marcellino BK, Verstovsek S, Mascarenhas J. The myelodepletive phenotype in myelofibrosis: Clinical relevance and therapeutic implications. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2020;20(7):415–21.
2. Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R, Passamonti F, Verstovsek S, Vannucchi AM, et al. Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. Blood. 2013;122(8):1395–8.
3. Quintás-Cardama A, Verstovsek S. Molecular pathways: JAK/STAT pathway: Mutations, inhibitors, and resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(8):1933–40.
4. Schieber M, Crispino JD, Stein B. Myelofibrosis in 2019: Moving beyond JAK2 inhibition. Blood Cancer J. 2019;9(9):74.
5. Szuber N, Mudireddy M, Nicolosi M, Penna D, Vallapureddy RR, Lasho TL, et al. 3023 Mayo Clinic patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms: risk-stratified comparison of survival and outcomes data among disease subtypes. Mayo Clin Proc. 2019;94(4):599–610.