The Pediatric Palliative Care Quality Network: Palliative Care Consultation and Patient Outcomes

Author:

Postier Andrea C.12,Root Maggie C.3,O’Riordan David L.4,Purser Lisa2,Friedrichsdorf Stefan J.12,Pantilat Steven Z.4,Bogetz Jori F.5

Affiliation:

1. aDivision of Pediatric Pain, Palliative and Integrative Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, California

2. bStad Center for Pediatric Pain, Palliative and Integrative Medicine, University of California San Francisco Benioff Children’s Hospitals, Oakland and San Francisco, California

3. cSchool of Nursing, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee

4. dDivision of Palliative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

5. eDivision of Bioethics and Palliative Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington School of Medicine, Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics and Palliative Care and Resilience Laboratory, Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Seattle Children’s Hospital and Research Institute, Seattle, Washington

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Quality benchmarking in pediatric palliative care (PPC) helps identify gaps in care and guides quality improvement. Our study objective was to characterize inpatient PPC referral processes, interdisciplinary PPC delivery, and patient outcomes from a multisite PPC data repository. METHODS Cross-sectional, administrative data analysis of 1587 PPC inpatient encounters at 5 US hospitals enrolled in the Pediatric Palliative Care Quality Network (2016–2022). PPC clinicians submitted data to a national repository for key quality indicators. Program and referral characteristics, care processes, and outcomes were examined descriptively. Time to referral, time on PPC service, and total hospital length of stay were compared by discharge disposition (alive or dead). RESULTS Programs were in service for 13 (range 6–17) years on average. Most encounters involved children >1 year old (77%). Common diagnoses were solid tumor cancer (29%) and congenital or chromosomal conditions (14%). Care was often provided by ≤2 PPC team members (53%) until discharge (median = 7d, interquartile range 2–23). There were often multiple reasons for PPC referral, including psychosocial support (78%), goals of care discussions/advance care planning (42%), management of non-pain symptoms (34%), and pain (21%). Moderate-severe symptoms improved by second assessment for pain (71%), dyspnea (51%), fatigue (46%), and feeding issues (39%). CONCLUSIONS Referrals to PPC were made early during hospitalization for psychosocial and physical symptom management. Moderate-severe symptom distress scores at initial assessment often improved. Findings highlight the need to ensure interdisciplinary PPC team staffing to meet the complex care needs of seriously ill children.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3