Refinement and Validation of a Clinical-Based Approach to Evaluate Young Febrile Infants

Author:

Yaeger Jeffrey P.12,Jones Jeremiah3,Ertefaie Ashkan3,Caserta Mary T.1,van Wijngaarden Edwin2,Fiscella Kevin4

Affiliation:

1. aDepartments of Pediatrics, and

2. cPublic Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York

3. bDepartments of Biostatistics/Computational Biology, and

4. dFamily Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE For febrile infants, predictive models to detect bacterial infections are available, but clinical adoption remains limited by implementation barriers. There is a need for predictive models using widely available predictors. Thus, we previously derived 2 novel predictive models (machine learning and regression) by using demographic and clinical factors, plus urine studies. The objective of this study is to refine and externally validate the predictive models. METHODS This is a cross-sectional study of infants initially evaluated at one pediatric emergency department from January 2011 to December 2018. Inclusion criteria were age 0 to 90 days, temperature ≥38°C, documented gestational age, and insurance type. To reduce potential biases, we derived models again by using derivation data without insurance status and tested the ability of the refined models to detect bacterial infections (ie, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, and meningitis) in the separate validation sample, calculating areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivities, and specificities. RESULTS Of 1419 febrile infants (median age 53 days, interquartile range = 32–69), 99 (7%) had a bacterial infection. Areas-under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve of machine learning and regression models were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89–0.94) and 0.90 (0.86–0.93) compared with 0.95 (0.91–0.98) and 0.96 (0.94–0.98) in the derivation study. Sensitivities and specificities of machine learning and regression models were 98.0% (94.7%–100%) and 54.2% (51.5%–56.9%) and 96.0% (91.5%–99.1%) and 50.0% (47.4%–52.7%). CONCLUSIONS Compared with the derivation study, the machine learning and regression models performed similarly. Findings suggest a clinical-based model can estimate bacterial infection risk. Future studies should prospectively test the models and investigate strategies to optimize clinical adoption.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3