Traditional Measures of Hospital Utilization May Not Accurately Reflect Dynamic Patient Demand: Findings From a Children’s Hospital

Author:

Fieldston Evan12345,Ragavan Meera2,Jayaraman Bhuvaneswari2,Metlay Joshua56,Pati Susmita57

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

2. Division of General Pediatrics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

3. PolicyLab, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

4. Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

5. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

6. Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

7. Division of Primary Care Pediatrics, State University of New York at Stony Brook and Stony Brook Long Island Children’s Hospital, Stony Brook, New York

Abstract

Objectives: Hospital crowding adversely affects access to emergent and elective care, quality and safety, patient and staff satisfaction, and trainee education. Reliable and valid measurements are crucial to operational planning and improvement, but traditional measures of hospital utilization may not accurately describe dynamic demand at hospitals. The goal of this study was to determine how effectively traditional measures express demand for hospital services and to describe the dynamic nature of patient flow in children’s hospitals compared with alternative measures. Methods: This was a retrospective administrative data review conducted at an urban, tertiary care children’s hospital. A total of 28 045 inpatients (22 310 from fiscal year 2008 and 5735 from 2 months in the fall of 2009 during the H1N1 influenza surge [October 16, 2009–November 18, 2009]) were reviewed. Admission-discharge-transfer data were abstracted from a total of 14 months (1 fiscal year and a separate 2 months including an influenza surge). Hourly hospital census and occupancy were determined. Measures of mean and median length of stay (LOS) were compared. Turnover was calculated by summing admissions, discharges, and interunit transfers. Coefficient of variation (SD/mean) was used to describe variation. Results: Midnight occupancy was generally closer to minimum occupancy than peak. Peak was usually between 10 AM and 12 PM and was a mean of 4% points higher than midnight (but as large as 13% points). Median LOS was 58% shorter than average LOS. There was a high level of turnover, and patient-days did not express the wide variation in how demand was generated by day of week. Conclusions: Traditional metrics for hospital utilization do not accurately express the true extent and dynamic nature of patient flow and inpatient demand at a children’s hospital. Hospitals and government regulatory agencies should consider additional means of measuring utilization to accurately determine demand, including its variation, and thus assist in budgeting, staffing, and capacity planning.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics,General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3