Abstract
More than 25 years have elapsed since continuous cardiorespiratory monitoring at home was suggested to decrease the risk of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). In the ensuing interval, multiple studies have been unable to establish the alleged efficacy of its use. In this statement, the most recent research information concerning extreme limits for a prolonged course of apnea of prematurity is reviewed. Recommendations regarding the appropriate use of home cardiorespiratory monitoring after hospital discharge emphasize limiting use to specific clinical indications for a predetermined period, using only monitors equipped with an event recorder, and counseling parents that monitor use does not prevent sudden, unexpected death in all circumstances. The continued implementation of proven SIDS prevention measures is encouraged.
Publisher
American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Reference35 articles.
1. Franks CI, Watson JB, Brown BH, Foster EF. Respiratory patterns and risk of sudden unexpected death in infancy. Arch Dis Child.1980;55:595–599
2. Southall DP, Richards JM, Rhoden KJ, et al. Prolonged apnea and cardiac arrhythmias in infants discharged from neonatal intensive care units: failure to predict an increased risk for sudden infant death syndrome. Pediatrics.1982;70:844–851
3. Rosen CL, Frost JD Jr, Harrison GM. Infant apnea: polygraphic studies and follow-up monitoring. Pediatrics.1983;71:731–736
4. Southall DP, Richards JM, Stebbens V, et al. Cardiorespiratory function in 16 full-term infants with sudden infant death syndrome. Pediatrics.1986;78:787–796
5. Schwartz PJ, Southall DP, Valdes-Dapena M. The sudden infant death syndrome: cardiac and respiratory mechanisms and interventions. Proceedings. May 24–27, 1987, Como, Italy. Ann N Y Acad Sci.1988;533:1–474
Cited by
198 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献