Clinical Effectiveness of Telemedicine-Based Pediatric Genetics Care

Author:

Szigety Katherine M.1,Crowley Terrence B.1,Gaiser Kimberly B.1,Chen Erin Y.1,Priestley Jessica R.C.1,Williams Lydia S.1,Rangu Sneha A.1,Wright Christina M.2,Adusumalli Priyanka1,Ahrens-Nicklas Rebecca C.1,Calderon Brandon1,Cuddapah Sanmati R.1,Edmondson Andrew1,Ficicioglu Can1,Ganetzky Rebecca1,Kalish Jennifer M.134,Krantz Ian D.1234,McDonald-McGinn Donna M.13,Medne Livija1,Muraresku Colleen1,Pyle Louise C.13,Zackai Elaine H.1,Campbell Ian M.15,Sheppard Sarah E.123

Affiliation:

1. aDivision of Human Genetics

2. bPerelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

3. cDepartments of Pediatrics

4. dGenetics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

5. eDepartment of Biomedical and Health Information, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Telemedicine may increase access to medical genetics care. However, in the pediatric setting, how telemedicine may affect the diagnostic rate is unknown, partially because of the perceived importance of the dysmorphology physical examination. We studied the clinical effectiveness of telemedicine for patients with suspected or confirmed genetic conditions. METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study of outpatient encounters before and after the widespread implementation of telemedicine (N = 5854). Visit types, diagnoses, patient demographic characteristics, and laboratory data were acquired from the electronic health record. Patient satisfaction was assessed through survey responses. New molecular diagnosis was the primary end point. RESULTS Patients seen by telemedicine were more likely to report non-Hispanic White ancestry, prefer to speak English, live in zip codes with higher median incomes, and have commercial insurance (all P < .01). Genetic testing was recommended for more patients evaluated by telemedicine than in person (79.5% vs 70.9%; P < .001). Patients seen in person were more likely to have a sample collected, resulting in similar test completion rates (telemedicine, 51.2%; in person, 55.1%; P = .09). There was no significant difference in molecular diagnosis rate between visit modalities (telemedicine, 13.8%; in person, 12.4%; P = .40). CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine and traditional in-person evaluation resulted in similar molecular diagnosis rates. However, improved methodologies for remote sample collection may be required. This study reveals the feasibility of telemedicine in a large academic medical genetics practice and is applicable to other pediatric specialties with perceived importance of physical examination.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3