Understanding Disparities in the Pediatric ICU: A Scoping Review

Author:

Andrist Erica12,Clarke Rachel G.34,Phelps Kayla B.5,Dews Alyssa L.67,Rodenbough Anna89,Rose Jerri A.1011,Zurca Adrian D.1213,Lawal Nurah214,Maratta Christina151617,Slain Katherine N.1118

Affiliation:

1. aDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

2. Departments of bPediatrics

3. cDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Upstate University Hospital, Syracuse, New York

4. dCenter for Bioethics and Humanities, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, New York

5. eDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Children’s Hospital of New Orleans, New Orleans, Louisiana

6. fSusan B. Meister Child Health and Adolescent Research Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan

7. gHuman Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan

8. hDivision of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia

9. iDepartment of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia

10. jPediatric Emergency Medicine

11. kDepartment of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio

12. lDivision of Critical Care, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

13. mDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

14. nStepping Stones Pediatric Palliative Care Program, C.S. Mott Children’s Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan

15. oDepartment of Critical Care, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

16. pInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care

17. qDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

18. rPediatric Critical Care Medicine, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Health disparities are pervasive in pediatrics. We aimed to describe disparities among patients who are likely to be cared for in the PICU and delineate how sociodemographic data are collected and categorized. METHODS Using MEDLINE as a data source, we identified studies which included an objective to assess sociodemographic disparities among PICU patients in the United States. We created a review rubric, which included methods of sociodemographic data collection and analysis, outcome and exposure variables assessed, and study findings. Two authors reviewed every study. We used the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Framework to organize outcome and exposure variables. RESULTS The 136 studies included used variable methods of sociodemographic data collection and analysis. A total of 30 of 124 studies (24%) assessing racial disparities used self- or parent-identified race. More than half of the studies (52%) dichotomized race as white and “nonwhite” or “other” in some analyses. Socioeconomic status (SES) indicators also varied; only insurance status was used in a majority of studies (72%) evaluating SES. Consistent, although not uniform, disadvantages existed for racial minority populations and patients with indicators of lower SES. The authors of only 1 study evaluated an intervention intended to mitigate health disparities. Requiring a stated objective to evaluate disparities aimed to increase the methodologic rigor of included studies but excluded some available literature. CONCLUSIONS Variable, flawed methodologies diminish our understanding of disparities in the PICU. Meaningfully understanding and addressing health inequity requires refining how we collect, analyze, and interpret relevant data.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Reference182 articles.

1. Health disparities and health equity: the issue is justice;Braveman;Am J Public Health,2011

2. Healthy people;US Department of Health and Human Services

3. Technical report--racial and ethnic disparities in the health and health care of children;Flores;Pediatrics,2010

4. Social determinants of health;Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

5. Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic disparities in patient safety events for hospitalized children;Stockwell;Hosp Pediatr,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3