Antenatal Consent in the SUPPORT Trial: Challenges, Costs, and Representative Enrollment

Author:

Rich Wade D.1,Auten Kathy J.2,Gantz Marie G.3,Hale Ellen C.45,Hensman Angelita M.6,Newman Nancy S.7,Finer Neil N.8,

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Pediatrics and

2. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina;

3. Statistics and Epidemiology Unit, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina;

4. Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia;

5. Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia;

6. Department of Pediatrics, Women and Infants' Hospital, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; and

7. Department of Pediatrics, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH

8. Neonatology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California;

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purposes of this study were to quantify the time and effort involved in obtaining prenatal consent for the Neonatal Research Network Surfactant Positive Airway Pressure and Pulse Oximetry Randomized Trial (SUPPORT) and to determine whether the enrolled infants were representative of the eligible population. METHODS: Eligible subjects were likely to deliver in the SUPPORT gestational age window (24–2767 weeks). Data included who approached the subjects for consent, how often they approached, the duration of each contact, whether consent was obtained, and whether subjects were enrolled in the trial. Eligible, nonenrolled infants entered into the Neonatal Research Network Generic Database throughout the period of SUPPORT enrollment were compared with enrolled infants. RESULTS: A total of 2826 women were identified at 18 sites, 2228 were approached for consent, and 1219 (54.7%) agreed. For 76.9% of those approached, <3 visits (mean: 2.0 ± 1.2 visits) were required to complete the consent process. Of the 659 infants with consent who were delivered within the study window, 611 were enrolled. Mothers who received a neonatal consultation were more likely to give consent (P < .001). The proportion of infants not exposed to steroids was significantly greater in the nonapproached group than in the approached group (20.0% vs 3.4%; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: In a trial that involved preterm infants and required prenatal consent, >5 women were identified as being likely to deliver in the SUPPORT gestational age window for each 1 who delivered an enrolled infant.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference12 articles.

1. What do parents think about enrolling their premature babies in several research studies?;Morley;Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed,2005

2. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth;Roberts;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2006

3. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement;Begg;JAMA,1996

4. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials;Moher;JAMA,2001

5. Applying results of randomised trials to clinical practice: impact of losses before randomisation;Charlson;Br Med J (Clin Res Ed),1984

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3