Reforming Procedural Skills Training for Pediatric Residents: A Randomized, Interventional Trial

Author:

Gaies Michael G.1,Morris Shaine A.2,Hafler Janet P.3,Graham Dionne A.4,Capraro Andrew J.5,Zhou Jing4,Landrigan Christopher P.56,Sandora Thomas J.57

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C. S. Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan

2. Department of Cardiology, Baylor School of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas

3. Office of Educational Affairs, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

4. Clinical Research Program

5. Department of Medicine

6. Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

7. Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pediatric housestaff are required to learn basic procedural skills and demonstrate competence during training. To our knowledge, an evidenced-based procedural skills curriculum does not exist. OBJECTIVE: To create, implement, and evaluate a modular procedural skills curriculum for pediatric residents. METHODS: A randomized, controlled trial was performed. Thirty-eight interns in the Boston Combined Residency Program who began their training in 2005 were enrolled and randomly assigned. Modules were created to teach residents bag-mask ventilation, venipuncture, peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) insertion, and lumbar puncture skills. The curriculum was administered to participants in the intervention group during intern orientation. Interns in the control group learned procedural skills by usual methods. Subjects were evaluated by using a structured objective assessment on simulators immediately after the intervention and 7 months later. Success in performing live-patient procedures was self-reported by subjects. The primary outcome was successful performance of the procedure on the initial assessment. Secondary outcomes included checklist and knowledge examination scores, live-patient success, and qualitative assessment of the curriculum. RESULTS: Participants in the intervention group performed PIV placement more successfully than controls (79% vs 35%) and scored significantly higher on the checklist for PIV placement (81% vs 61%) and lumbar puncture (77% vs 68%) at the initial assessment. There were no differences between groups at month 7, and both groups demonstrated declining skills. There were no statistically significant differences in success on live-patient procedures. Those in the intervention group scored significantly higher on knowledge examinations. CONCLUSIONS: Participants in the intervention group were more successful performing certain simulated procedures than controls when tested immediately after receiving the curriculum but demonstrated declining skills thereafter. Future efforts must emphasize retraining, and residents must have sufficient opportunities to practice skills learned in a formal curriculum.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference29 articles.

1. Sectish TC, Zalneraitis EL, Carraccio C, Behrman RE. The state of pediatric residency training: a period of transformation of graduate medical education. Pediatrics. 2004;114(3):832–841

2. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Outcome project, 2001. Available at: www.acgme.org/Outcome. Accessed October 24, 2004

3. Association of American Medical Colleges. AAMC/1998 report I: learning objectives for medical student education guidelines for medical schools. Available at: www.aamc.org/publications/showfile.cfm?file=version87.pdf&prd_id=198&prv_id=239&pdf_id=87. Accessed October 24, 2004

4. Wigton RS. See one, do one, teach one. Acad Med. 1992;67(11):742

5. Mason WT, Strike PW. See one, do one, teach one—is this still how it works? A comparison of the medical and nursing professions in the teaching of practical procedures. Med Teach. 2003;25(6):664–666

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3