Adverse Events in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: Development, Testing, and Findings of an NICU-Focused Trigger Tool to Identify Harm in North American NICUs

Author:

Sharek Paul J.1,Horbar Jeffrey D.23,Mason Wilbert4,Bisarya Hema5,Thurm Cary W.5,Suresh Gautham6,Gray James E.7,Edwards William H.8,Goldmann Donald910,Classen David11

Affiliation:

1. Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California

2. Vermont Oxford Network, Burlington, Vermont

3. Department of Pediatrics, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont

4. Division of Infectious Diseases and Quality Management Program, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California

5. Division of Performance Improvement, Child Health Corporation of America, Shawnee Mission, Kansas

6. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina

7. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

8. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire

9. Institute for Healthcare Improvement, Cambridge, Massachusetts

10. Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital, Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

11. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. Currently there are few practical methods to identify and measure harm to hospitalized children. Patients in NICUs are at high risk and warrant a detailed assessment of harm to guide patient safety efforts. The purpose of this work was to develop a NICU-focused tool for adverse event detection and to describe the incidence of adverse events in NICUs identified by this tool. METHODS. A NICU-focused trigger tool for adverse event detection was developed and tested. Fifty patients from each site with a minimum 2-day NICU stay were randomly selected. All adverse events identified using the trigger tool were evaluated for severity, preventability, ability to mitigate, ability to identify the event earlier, and presence of associated occurrence report. Each trigger, and the entire tool, was evaluated for positive predictive value. Study chart reviewers, in aggregate, identified 88.0% of all potential triggers and 92.4% of all potential adverse events. RESULTS. Review of 749 randomly selected charts from 15 NICUs revealed 2218 triggers or 2.96 per patient, and 554 unique adverse events or 0.74 per patient. The positive predictive value of the trigger tool was 0.38. Adverse event rates were higher for patients <28 weeks' gestation and <1500 g birth weight. Fifty-six percent of all adverse events were deemed preventable; 16% could have been identified earlier, and 6% could have been mitigated more effectively. Only 8% of adverse events were identified in existing hospital-based occurrence reports. The most common adverse events identified were nosocomial infections, catheter infiltrates, and abnormal cranial imaging. CONCLUSIONS. Adverse event rates in the NICU setting are substantially higher than previously described. Many adverse events resulted in permanent harm and the majority were classified as preventable. Only 8% were identified using traditional voluntary reporting methods. Our NICU-focused trigger tool appears efficient and effective at identifying adverse events.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Cited by 268 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3