Improving Pediatric Dosing Through Pediatric Initiatives: What We Have Learned

Author:

Rodriguez William1,Selen Arzu1,Avant Debbie1,Chaurasia Chandra1,Crescenzi Terrie1,Gieser Gerlie1,Di Giacinto Jennifer1,Huang Shiew-Mei1,Lee Peter1,Mathis Lisa1,Murphy Dianne1,Murphy Shirley1,Roberts Rosemary1,Sachs Hari Cheryl1,Suarez Sandra1,Tandon Veneeta1,Uppoor Ramana S.1

Affiliation:

1. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The goal was to review the impact of pediatric drug studies, as measured by the improvement in pediatric dosing and other pertinent information captured in the drug labeling. METHODS. We reviewed the pediatric studies for 108 products submitted (July 1998 through October 2005) in response to a Food and Drug Administration written request for pediatric studies, and the subsequent labeling changes. We analyzed the dosing modifications and focused on drug clearance as an important parameter influencing pediatric dosing. RESULTS. The first 108 drugs with new or revised pediatric labeling changes had dosing changes or pharmacokinetic information (n = 23), new safety information (n = 34), information concerning lack of efficacy (n = 19), new pediatric formulations (n = 12), and extended age limits (n = 77). A product might have had ≥1 labeling change. We selected specific examples (n = 16) that illustrate significant differences in pediatric pharmacokinetics. CONCLUSIONS. Critical changes in drug labeling for pediatric patients illustrate that unique pediatric dosing often is necessary, reflecting growth and maturational stages of pediatric patients. These changes provide evidence that pediatric dosing should not be determined by simply applying weight-based calculations to the adult dose. Drug clearance is highly variable in the pediatric population and is not readily predictable on the basis of adult information.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference17 articles.

1. Shirkey H. Therapeutic orphans. J Pediatr.1968;72(1):119–128

2. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Drugs. Guidelines for the ethical conduct of studies to evaluate drugs in pediatric populations. Pediatrics.1977;60(1):91–101

3. Food and Drug Administration. Labeling and prescription drug advertising: content and format for labeling for human prescription drugs. Fed Regist.1979;44:37434–37467

4. Food and Drug Administration. Specific requirements on content and format of labeling of human prescription drugs: revision of “pediatric use” subsection in the labeling. Fed Regist.1994;59:64240–64250

5. Food and Drug Administration. Regulation requiring manufacturers to assess the safety and effectiveness of new drugs and biological products in pediatric patients: final rule. Fed Regist.1998;63;66631–66672

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3