Characteristics of Neonatal Units That Care for Very Preterm Infants in Europe: Results From the MOSAIC Study

Author:

Van Reempts Patrick1,Gortner Ludwig2,Milligan David3,Cuttini Marina4,Petrou Stavros5,Agostino Rocco6,Field David7,den Ouden Lya8,Børch Klaus9,Mazela Jan10,Carrapato Manuel11,Zeitlin Jennifer12,

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neonatology, Antwerp University Hospital, University of Antwerp and Study Centre for Perinatal Epidemiology, Flanders, Belgium

2. Pediatric University Hospital, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany

3. Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom

4. Unit of Epidemiology, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy

5. National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford, United Kingdom

6. Department for Mother's and Infant's Health, Hospital S. Giovanni Calibita–Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy

7. Department of Health Science, University of Leicester, Neonatal Unit, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, United Kingdom

8. Health Care Inspectorate, Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports, the Hague, Netherlands

9. Department of Pediatrics, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidore, Denmark

10. Department of Neonatology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland

11. Department of Pediatrics, Hospital de São Sebastião, Sta Maria da Feira, Portugal

12. Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, UMR S149, Epidemiological Research Unit on Perinatal and Women's Health, and Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Paris, France

Abstract

OBJECTIVES. We sought to compare guidelines for level III units in 10 European regions and analyze the characteristics of neonatal units that care for very preterm infants. METHODS. The MOSAIC (Models of Organising Access to Intensive Care for Very Preterm Births) project combined a prospective cohort study on all births between 22 and 31 completed weeks of gestation in 10 European regions and a survey of neonatal unit characteristics. Units that admitted ≥5 infants at <32 weeks of gestation were included in the analysis (N = 111). Place of hospitalization of infants who were admitted to neonatal care was analyzed by using the cohort data (N = 4947). National or regional guidelines for level III units were reviewed. RESULTS. Six of 9 guidelines for level III units included minimum size criteria, based on number of intensive care beds (6 guidelines), neonatal admissions (2), ventilated patients (1), obstetric intensive care beds (1), and deliveries (2). The characteristics of level III units varied, and many were small or unspecialized by recommended criteria: 36% had fewer than 50 very preterm annual admissions, 22% ventilated fewer than 50 infants annually, and 28% had fewer than 6 intensive care beds. Level II units were less specialized, but some provided mechanical ventilation (57%) or high-frequency ventilation (20%) or had neonatal surgery facilities (17%). Sixty-nine percent of level III and 36% of level I or II units had continuous medical coverage by a qualified pediatrician. Twenty-two percent of infants who were <28 weeks of gestation were treated in units that admitted fewer than 50 very preterm infants annually (range: 2%–54% across the study regions). CONCLUSIONS. No consensus exists in Europe about size or other criteria for NICUs. A better understanding of the characteristics associated with high-quality neonatal care is needed, given the high proportion of very preterm infants who are cared for in units that are considered small or less specialized by many recommendations.

Publisher

American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)

Subject

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Reference53 articles.

1. Kollée LA, Verloove-Vanhorick PP, Verwey RA, Brand R, Ruys JH. Maternal and neonatal transport: results of a national collaborative survey of preterm and very low birth weight infants in the Netherlands. Obstet Gynecol. 1988;72:729–732

2. Lubchenco LO, Butterfield LJ, Delaney-Black V, Goldson E, Koops BL, Lazotte DC. Outcome of very-low-birth-weight infants: does antepartum verus neonatal referral have a better impact on mortality, morbidity, or long-term outcome?Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;160:539–545

3. Modanlou HD, Dorchester W, Freeman R, Rommal C. Perinatal transport to a regional perinatal center in a metropolitan area: maternal versus neonatal transport. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1980;138:1157–1164

4. Mondalou HD, Dorchester WL, Thorosian A, Freeman RK. Antenatal versus neonatal transport to a regional perinatal center: a comparison between matched pairs. Obstet Gynecol. 1979;53:725–729

5. Ozminkowski RJ, Wortman PM, Roloff DW. Inborn/outborn status and neonatal survival: a meta-analysis of non randomised studies. Stat Med. 1988;7:1207–1221

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3